Phase-Separation Phenomena in Glasses / Likvatsionnye Yavleniya v Steklakh / Ликвационные Явления В Стеклах 1973
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-0157-9_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causes of Phase Separation in Simple Silicate Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In G1.00, both Si and Al phase separation are observable to greater extent. It has been reported that Mg shows higher phase separation tendencies than Na in silicate systems (Galakhov and Varshal, 1973;Kreidl, 1991;Hudon and Baker, 2002). This can explain the phase separation observed in compositions close to magnesium endmember.…”
Section: Understanding Phase Separation In Glasses Through Semmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In G1.00, both Si and Al phase separation are observable to greater extent. It has been reported that Mg shows higher phase separation tendencies than Na in silicate systems (Galakhov and Varshal, 1973;Kreidl, 1991;Hudon and Baker, 2002). This can explain the phase separation observed in compositions close to magnesium endmember.…”
Section: Understanding Phase Separation In Glasses Through Semmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…They suggested that the electrostatic bond strength (Z/C n , where Z and C n represent cation charge and coordination number respectively) of the network-modifying cations influences the shape of liquidus curve and the immiscibility. Galakhov and Varshal (1973) proposed that cationic field strength (Z/r 2 ) is the significant factor controlling phase separation in simple silicate systems. The network-modifying cations with higher field strength produces greater phase separation.…”
Section: Understanding Phase Separation In Glasses Through Semmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of the formation of hierarchical structures deserves special attention. One of these processes is phase decay and, in particular, separation in the liquid phase -miscibility gap [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. The structures that appear upon rapid cooling of samples from the miscibility gap can be classified as hierarchical due to the appearance of a number of sublevels with rounded inclusions ranging in size from 0.01 to 10 µm [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The liquid immiscibility in simple silicate systems is attributed to the formation of network modifying cations into cation-oxygen groups, which differ from silica oxygen (network forming) ones (Galakhov and Varshal, 1969;Varshal, 1981). The distribution of net work forming cations and modifier cations in the melt structure leads to the differentiation between polymer ized and depolymerized domains in the melt and, cor respondingly, to the splitting of liquid into two phases.…”
Section: Previous Studies and Formation Mechanism Of The Immiscibilitmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…3. The average com positions of urtites and lujavrites from different units of the differentiated complexes of the Lovozero alka line massif (Gerasimovskii et al, 1966) and those of loparites and urtites, malignites and lujavrites (Vlasov et al, 1959) are shown for comparison. It is seen that natural objects are close in composition to run prod ucts produced by liquid immiscibility in the melts, exclusively, in the presence of aqueous fluid.…”
Section: Experimental Studies Of Alkaline Magmaticmentioning
confidence: 99%