2020
DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2020.1716132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causes of delay in the global construction industry: a meta analytical review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
58
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
58
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This may indicate that planning and delay issues have been solved to an acceptable degree in developed countries and are no longer considered worthy of further study. Nevertheless, as concluded by Sanni-Anibire et al [9], the causes of delay can be country/location and project specific, thus justifying country-specific research studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This may indicate that planning and delay issues have been solved to an acceptable degree in developed countries and are no longer considered worthy of further study. Nevertheless, as concluded by Sanni-Anibire et al [9], the causes of delay can be country/location and project specific, thus justifying country-specific research studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Research into delay factors for the construction industry can be found from as early as 1985, with 1 to 3 articles being published yearly until 2006, and 4 to 8 thereafter, with a spike of 18 published in 2017 [7]. In fact, three concurrent studies published in 2020 carried out a meta-analytical review of the relevant literature claiming to determine global causes of delay in the construction industry [8][9][10]. More specifically, 47 research articles, yielding 1057 different causes of delays, were examined by Viles et al [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These projects are however characterized by uncertainties that affect the success of the project, usually expressed in cost, time, and quality [1,2]. Experts are of the opinion that large variances in the estimated and actual duration of construction projects due to underestimation is one of the prevalent problems in the industry [3]. Bromilow [4] suggested that only one-eighth of building contracts were completed within the scheduled completion dates and that the average time overrun exceeded 40%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat, CTBUH [6] in its report "Dream Deferred: Unfinished Tall Buildings" noted the alarming rate of increase of "never completed" tall buildings. Previous researchers have suggested that a reliable prediction of the duration of construction projects is crucial to avoiding construction delays [7,8,3,9]. Traditional methods such as the Critical Path Method (CPM) or Program Evaluation Research Task (PERT) have been shown to consistently underestimate the actual project duration [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%