2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causes of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Failure and Strategies for Surgical Revision: Implications of Device Component Survival

Abstract: Artificial urinary sphincters remain prone to failure over time. In many instances, correcting only the pressure-regulating balloon may effectively restore device function, allowing for a less invasive revision.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this did not prompt immediate revision, as the median time before revision was 26.5 months [8.8, 54] which is consistent with the existing literature (11,23,24).…”
Section: -Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, this did not prompt immediate revision, as the median time before revision was 26.5 months [8.8, 54] which is consistent with the existing literature (11,23,24).…”
Section: -Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Almost half a century after its introduction, the prevalence and causes of male AUS revisions remain elusive (2,11,12). This contributes to hamper patients' information and preclude to shape prevention strategies aiming to improve the use of AUS in male patients.…”
Section: -Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in line with recent literature demonstrating that mechanical failure is the most common etiology of AUS device revision. 15,22,23 This should motivate improvements or alternative treatments for stress urinary incontinence; although the AUS has been revolutionary, it has fundamentally remained unchanged since inception.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps this could be more clinically effective than sacral nerve stimulation in humans. The indications for an artificial urinary sphincter are expanding and, although it remains prone to failure over time, the number of suitable patients will increase (Srivastava et al, ).…”
Section: The Futurementioning
confidence: 99%