The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causes, consequences and mechanisms of breeding dispersal in the colonial lesser kestrel, Falco naumanni

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Male birds are indeed the most active sex in both resource and territory defense and hence benefit more from being familiar with their natal surrounding (Clarke et al ). Shift in breeding site can also be related to local ecological conditions, such as spatial variation in food abundance (Korpimäki ), intra‐specific competition for breeding vacancies (Nevoux et al ), or predation risk (Calabuig et al ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Male birds are indeed the most active sex in both resource and territory defense and hence benefit more from being familiar with their natal surrounding (Clarke et al ). Shift in breeding site can also be related to local ecological conditions, such as spatial variation in food abundance (Korpimäki ), intra‐specific competition for breeding vacancies (Nevoux et al ), or predation risk (Calabuig et al ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the exact relationship between breeding density and breeding dispersal is all but clear, often appearing to be highly species-and contextdependent. For example, breeding dispersal may decrease with increasing colony size, matching the expected fitness returns (Serrano et al 2001; but see Calabuig et al 2008), whereas in other species, breeding dispersal occurs from high density to low density (Aars and Ims 2000). Contrasting with the above situations, the highest breeding site fidelity may occur at intermediate densities in colonial seabirds (Kim et al 2009), and yet other studies have found that breeding dispersal is density independent (Forero et al 1999;Newton 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…While some studies have found that dispersing may improve subsequent breeding success (Hepp and Kennamer 1992;Forero et al 1999;Newton 2001;Calabuig et al 2008), negative results are more prevalent (Clark and Shutler 1999;Danchin and Cam 2002;Shutler and Clark 2003;Schaub and von Hirschheydt 2009). This leaves us with an apparent paradox: while we inherently assume that breeding dispersal is adaptive, it is often difficult to ascribe an adaptive function to the behaviour (Clark and Shutler 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Juveniles that dispersed did so on long distances, while adults showed much higher fidelity on their breeding grounds. There is evidence that the probability of dispersal decreases with age (Serrano et al 2001, Calabuig et al 2008 while such long distance dispersal movements exist but could be underestimated (Prugnolle et al 2003). A reason for that could be that estimating philopatry rates from ringing recovery data has its drawbacks since ringing intensity varies with locations and longdistance dispersal movements of individuals could be difficult to detect.…”
Section: Philopatrymentioning
confidence: 99%