2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41580-020-00308-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causes and consequences of RNA polymerase II stalling during transcript elongation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
99
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 231 publications
4
99
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, this first model considered that all RNAP molecules have the same properties and the same dynamics throughout the transcription unit. This, however, does not correspond to the reality of the transcription cycle, where RNAP frequently pauses and backtracks, notably in the termination zone (reviewed in Noe Gonzalez et al [2021]). We therefore built a second model (Fig 4D ), where RNAP may dynamically switch between an elongating, mobile form (in orange on Fig 4D ) and a backtracked, immobile state (in red on Fig 4D).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, this first model considered that all RNAP molecules have the same properties and the same dynamics throughout the transcription unit. This, however, does not correspond to the reality of the transcription cycle, where RNAP frequently pauses and backtracks, notably in the termination zone (reviewed in Noe Gonzalez et al [2021]). We therefore built a second model (Fig 4D ), where RNAP may dynamically switch between an elongating, mobile form (in orange on Fig 4D ) and a backtracked, immobile state (in red on Fig 4D).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess a biological readout of the repressive chromatin environment, we turned to phenotypic analysis of TFIIS disruption. TFIIS is a general elongation factor that rescues stalled Pol II; and nucleosomal barriers have been shown to increase stalled Pol II [45]. Given that Pol II stalling is common across the genome [46], it is paradoxical that the gene encoding TFIIS is not essential for viability in actively dividing cells, and its deletion does not cause strong growth defects [47].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, analysis of RNA Polymerase II (RNAPII) dynamics upon deletion of the −5SE shows a complete loss of RNAPII at the Nanog promoter, indicating that the −5SE modulates Nanog expression by recruiting RNAPII or by promoting its conversion to its initiating form through phosphorylation of Ser 5 of the C-terminal domain (CTD, Figure 1C). Further analysis of the −45SE and its role in regulating Nanog gene expression is necessary to determine whether the two enhancers utilize the same or distinct mechanism(s) from the −5SE (Figure 1D; Henriques et al, 2018;Chen et al, 2018;Bartman et al, 2019;Sheridan et al, 2019;Zatreanu et al, 2019;Noe Gonzalez et al, 2020).…”
Section: Enhancersmentioning
confidence: 99%