2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
759
3
63

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 609 publications
(955 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(128 reference statements)
28
759
3
63
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, based on the work by Sarasvathy (2001), Chandler et al (2009) provide a framework contrasting causation and effectuation along the lines of goal definition, key decision parameters, dealing with uncertainty, and basis of exploitation (see Table 1). …”
Section: International New Venture Creationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More specifically, based on the work by Sarasvathy (2001), Chandler et al (2009) provide a framework contrasting causation and effectuation along the lines of goal definition, key decision parameters, dealing with uncertainty, and basis of exploitation (see Table 1). …”
Section: International New Venture Creationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While both IB and IE literatures are increasingly addressing effectuation in internationalization, quantitative research on this subject seems underdeveloped, owing to the fact that C&E have only recently been operationalized (Chandler et al 2009;Moroz and Hindle 2012;Perry et al 2012). Thus, this paper seeks to empirically test key antecedents and consequences of causation-and effectuation-based decision-making processes in the INVC process, with the goal of adding to scholarly understanding of internationalization processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, Read, Dew, Sarasvathy, Song, and Wiltbank's (2009) meta-analysis of effectuation and venture performance is based on the premise that there is an inherent variation in the extent to which firms or entrepreneurs follow an effectual logic. Third, Sarasvathy, Kumar, York, and Bhagavatula (2014) acknowledge that empirical measures of effectuation are necessary, citing Chandler, DeTienne, McKelvie, and Mumford's (2011) developed measure of effectuation. Finally, RDSW's table of effectuation research contains many studies that have followed variance-based logic.…”
Section: Categorical Delusions Of Grandeurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These issues are concerned mostly with organizational problems of entrepreneurs (Chandler et al, 2011). But by our opinion the most important problem of innovation projects commercialization is lying in the sphere of inexperienced researchers and project team members (may be even in the project team founders).…”
Section: Some General Issues In Innovation Projects Development and Imentioning
confidence: 99%