2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10669-015-9537-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causality relationships between renewable energy, nuclear energy and economic growth in France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To detect the direction of causality between these two variables, four hypotheses were considered: the growth hypothesis, conservation hypothesis, feedback hypothesis, and neutrality hypothesis. Many studies that use nuclear energy [54,55] or renewable energy [42,45] as a proxy for clean energy have found support for the growth hypothesis, which indicates that investing in clean energy construction fosters economic growth through the generation of new businesses and employment opportunities, as well the import substitution of energy [56,57]. In turn, other researchers have shown that renewable energy consumption increases as a result of economic growth, which is consistent with the conservation hypothesis [39,58,59].…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 63%
“…To detect the direction of causality between these two variables, four hypotheses were considered: the growth hypothesis, conservation hypothesis, feedback hypothesis, and neutrality hypothesis. Many studies that use nuclear energy [54,55] or renewable energy [42,45] as a proxy for clean energy have found support for the growth hypothesis, which indicates that investing in clean energy construction fosters economic growth through the generation of new businesses and employment opportunities, as well the import substitution of energy [56,57]. In turn, other researchers have shown that renewable energy consumption increases as a result of economic growth, which is consistent with the conservation hypothesis [39,58,59].…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 63%
“…In terms of the relationships between nuclear consumption and economic development, neutral hypothesis was found by Bowden and Payne [32] and Rufael [33] in the U.S. and Taiwan, yet the scholars didn't consider the impacts of carbon emission during the utilization processes of nuclear power. Growth hypothesis was supported in the empirical studies on South Korea, India, and France by Yoo and Ku, Rufael, and Mbarek and Khairallah [34][35][36]. Little research has been done on the causality between nuclear production and carbon emissions, while the comparative advantage of nuclear to fossil fuels in long-term emission reduction has been confirmed by Iwata et al and Baek and Kim [37,38].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It suggests that policies enacted on saving energy may adversely impact economic growth. This hypothesis was demonstrated by Yang (2000), Apergis and Payne (2011), Tang (2008), Omri et al (2014), Saidi and Hammami (2015a) and Mbarek et al (2015). Finally, the neutrality hypothesis assumes no causal relation between GDP growth and energy consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The Cobb-Douglas production functions including capital and labour as additional factors of production. GDP depends also on energy consumption, which is directly related to CO 2 emissions (Omri et al, 2014;Saidi and Hammami, 2015a;Mbarek et al, 2015;Chaabouni, 2016). In addition, Anwar and Sun (2011) and Omri et al (2014), among others, include trade and FDI in the production function to examine the impact of these variables on economic growth.…”
Section: The Model and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%