Proceedings of the 34th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3297280.3297406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causality relationship among attributes applied in an educational data set

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Causal mining refers to seeking for causal relationship in data. In education, it has been used to identify the characteristics of students' behaviour that contribute to their learning outcomes, problems, grades, etc 68 . Classification and Regression are two widely used prediction methods that have been used for estimating student's performance and characteristics 3,75 .…”
Section: Common Methods In Edm and Lamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Causal mining refers to seeking for causal relationship in data. In education, it has been used to identify the characteristics of students' behaviour that contribute to their learning outcomes, problems, grades, etc 68 . Classification and Regression are two widely used prediction methods that have been used for estimating student's performance and characteristics 3,75 .…”
Section: Common Methods In Edm and Lamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"There are several different types of educational settings, including traditional education, CBE, and BL (Figure 5). Each of them offers several data sources (Romero & Ventura, 2007) [24].…”
Section: Educational Area and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the ACM Alan Turing prize was awarded to Judea Pearl in 2011 for his contribution to Machine Learning, the number of papers considering Causal Inference has significantly increased. The researches in causality evolves different fields of knowledges such as application of causality, (de Carvalho and Zarate, 2019); feature selection, (Yang et al , 2019) and (Tsamardinos et al , 2018), missing data (Shpitser and Pearl, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%