2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2022.101521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causality redux: The evolution of empirical methods in accounting research and the growth of quasi-experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are not without caveats. Despite our best efforts to triangulate quasi‐experimental evidence (e.g., external shocks to independent analyst coverage) with nonexperimental tests (e.g., cross‐sectional variation in independent analyst coverage), we do not observe the data generation process (Armstrong et al., 2022). Hence, while the triangulation of evidence provides us with some confidence that the negative relation between independent analyst coverage and earnings management can be interpreted as independent analysts being more effective than brokerage analysts in monitoring financial reporting and deterring earnings management, we cannot fully rule out all alternative explanations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings are not without caveats. Despite our best efforts to triangulate quasi‐experimental evidence (e.g., external shocks to independent analyst coverage) with nonexperimental tests (e.g., cross‐sectional variation in independent analyst coverage), we do not observe the data generation process (Armstrong et al., 2022). Hence, while the triangulation of evidence provides us with some confidence that the negative relation between independent analyst coverage and earnings management can be interpreted as independent analysts being more effective than brokerage analysts in monitoring financial reporting and deterring earnings management, we cannot fully rule out all alternative explanations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This evidence helps to provide more confidence that our prior results are consistent with more independent analysts driving the reduction in discretionary accruals surrounding the Global Settlement, rather than independent analysts choosing to cover firms with lower levels of discretionary accruals. A caveat should, however, be noted that since we cannot directly observe the data generation process, even with a quasi-natural experiment design, we cannot fully rule out all alternative explanations (Armstrong et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To very briefly summarize, Armstrong, Kepler, Samuels and Taylor (2022;henceforth AKST) start from the observation that there is a rising trend towards studies drawing causal inferences in the accounting literature. AKST review the empirical accounting literature in the top-3 journals to document this trend and provide descriptive evidence of the methods that accounting researchers use to draw causal inferences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
Armstrong et al (2022) review the empirical methods used in the accounting literature to draw causal inferences. They document a growing number of studies using quasi-experimental methods and provide a critical perspective on this trend as well as the use of these methods in the accounting literature.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%