1991
DOI: 10.1177/026327691008003003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causality or Interaction? Simmel, Weber and Interpretive Sociology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early "symbolic interactionists"-from Cooley (1902) and Simmel (1908) to Mead (1934) and others-emphasized the reflexive relationship of "self" and "other" (cf. Lichtblau 1991). In interaction, people act toward others (and themselves) as symbolic objects; by imaging oneself from the perspectives of others one forms a sense of self.…”
Section: Symbolic Interactionism and The Sanctification Of The Black ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early "symbolic interactionists"-from Cooley (1902) and Simmel (1908) to Mead (1934) and others-emphasized the reflexive relationship of "self" and "other" (cf. Lichtblau 1991). In interaction, people act toward others (and themselves) as symbolic objects; by imaging oneself from the perspectives of others one forms a sense of self.…”
Section: Symbolic Interactionism and The Sanctification Of The Black ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a significant level of appreciation that Simmel “determined his concept of social formation by analogy to the aesthetic concept of form” (Lichtblau 1991:55). One of the first to stress this aspect of Simmel's sociology was Arthur Salz (1965:236), a former student, who claimed: “[Simmel] conceived of … [sociology] as the study of forms of sociation.…”
Section: Simmel As Aesthetic Social Theoristmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between Simmel and Weber is a peculiar one. They were close friends, but the intellectual influences between them are not very clear and have been a topic of considerable scholarly debate (see Abel, 1970: 112-14;Faught, 1985;Léger, 1986;Levine, 1972, Lichtblau, 1991Nedelmann, 1988;Scaff, 1987Scaff, , 1988Turner, 1986: 104-10;C. Turner, 1989).…”
Section: Simmel and Webermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once Simmel had clarified his methodology more explicitly, it was influential for Weber's approach but mostly as a negative model (see Frisby, 1987: 425-7;Lichtblau, 1991;Scaff, 1988: 13-17;Turner, 1986: 104-5). In particular, Weber sought to depart from Simmel's methodology in formulating a cognitive rational interpretation of motives, rather than a psychological theory of consciousness.…”
Section: Simmel and Webermentioning
confidence: 99%