1977
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90039-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causality in temporal systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
62
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 521 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For our purposes, it is more convenient to rewrite the above bivariate process as two univariate processes (this can always be done according to [17]):…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For our purposes, it is more convenient to rewrite the above bivariate process as two univariate processes (this can always be done according to [17]):…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 2, we start by introducing an alternative formulation of Granger causality [17] and proceed to outline a framework within which the effects of added (measurement) noise on the estimation of directional influences in bivariate autoregressive processes can be addressed. To simplify matters, we then consider a bivariate first order autoregressive (AR(1)) process in Section 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appearance of both events is followed by concluding the presence of a feedback loop (Schmidt 1976;Pierce and Haugh 1977;Geweke et al 1983;Guilkey and Salemi 1982;Gao and Tian 2009). The F-statistics value computed for the purpose of the causality test assesses the equation presented above (2):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, causality runs from X to Y if knowledge of X results in a smaller error variance in predicting Y than would result from a prediction based solely on past observations of Y.? One might be hesitant to use the word 'causality' to describe the nature of the association that would then exist but it appears difficult to present an alternative definition for causality which can be empirically tested (Pierce and Haugh, 1977).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%