2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causality in quantiles and dynamic stock return–volume relations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
148
3
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
15
148
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the work of Chuang, Kuan, and Lin (2009), this study connects stock returns and trading volume through estimating the following quantile regression:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following the work of Chuang, Kuan, and Lin (2009), this study connects stock returns and trading volume through estimating the following quantile regression:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7, No. 11;2015 Chuang, Kuan, andLin (2009) investigate the casual relations between daily stock returns and volume of NYSE, S&P 500 and FTSE using quantile regressions. They find some evidence supporting the casual effects of volume on returns that described as heterogeneous across quantiles.…”
Section: Wwwccsenetorg/ijefmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chuang et al (2009) through adopting quantile regression to investigate the causal relationship between stock trading value and return rate of New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), Standard & Poor 500 (S&P 500), and Financial Times-Stock Exchange 100 (FTSE 100) state that when trading value increases, stock index returns will rise.…”
Section: Use Vector Auto Regression (Var) To Analyze Monthly Data Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more active stock market trade of a country shows the more prosperous on its economy. Due to this fact, numerous previous studies have explored the factors of affecting stock volatility, including stock trading value (Assogbavi et al, 1995;Saatcioglu and Starks, 1998;Chen et al, 2001;Lee and Rui, 2002;Statman et al, 2006;Xu et al, 2006;Rashid, 2007;Chuang et al, 2009;Chen, 2012) oil price (Jones and Kaul, 1996;Maghyereh and Kandari, 2007;Aloui and Jammazi, 2009;Qinbin et al, 2012;Mollick and Assefa, 2013) manufacturing industry production index (Mohanty et al, 2011) economic prosperity (Fan et al, 2003;Basher and Sadorsky, 2006;Driesprong et al, 2008;Tang et al, 2010) investment inclination (Faff and Brailsford, 1999;Hondroyiannis and Papapetrou, 2001;Henriques and Sadorsky, 2008;Mollick and Assefa, 2013) interest rate (Kagraoka and Moussa, 2013) the total value of import and export prices (Chen et al, 2001) exchange rate (Lyonnet and Werner, 2012) money supply (Eichengreen, 2013;Karras, 2013) price variation (Girardin and Moussa, 2011;Naifar and Dohaiman, 2013) unemployment rate (Nguyen and Bhatti, 2012;Schenkelberg and Watzka, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons of macroeconomic character are ordinarily related to the changes in the State budget, interest and inflation rates (Pilinkus and Boguslauskas 2009;Paškevičius and Dubinskas 2009;Wang, Yang and Li 2007). Insurance of investment portfolios, speculative operations on derivative financial instrument markets, risky acquisitions and "bubbles" caused by long-lasting speculations are attributed to microeconomic reasons (Malliaris and Urrutia 1992;Chuang et al 2009;Girdzijauskas et al 2009). And nevertheless, this point of view has received some criticism referring to the impossibility to verify the reliability of the conclusions (Dong and Liu 2007;Roll 1988).…”
Section: Forewordmentioning
confidence: 99%