2011
DOI: 10.5021/ad.2011.23.4.432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causality Assessment of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions

Abstract: BackgroundCutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are the most common adverse reactions attributed to drugs. A systematic and effective approach to a patient with suspected drug eruption allows for prompt recognition, classification and treatment of cutaneous ADRs. A standardized and effective approach for objective causality assessment is necessary to make consistent and accurate identification of ADRs.ObjectiveAlthough the Naranjo algorithm is the most widely used assessment tool, it contains many components… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Korean algorithm consists of 8 questions on adverse drug reactions, with scores of 9 or higher being "certain" for a reaction, 6 to 8 "probable/likely," and 3 to 5 "possible." 12 Seven of 8 patients in our study had "certain" reactions (all 7 had scores of 9), and 1 patient had a "probable/likely" reaction (score of 6).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Korean algorithm consists of 8 questions on adverse drug reactions, with scores of 9 or higher being "certain" for a reaction, 6 to 8 "probable/likely," and 3 to 5 "possible." 12 Seven of 8 patients in our study had "certain" reactions (all 7 had scores of 9), and 1 patient had a "probable/likely" reaction (score of 6).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, we found no comparative data in the medical literature. To provide an objective assessment of causality, we used the Korean algorithm 12 to further support our data ( Table 1). The Korean algorithm consists of 8 questions on adverse drug reactions, with scores of 9 or higher being "certain" for a reaction, 6 to 8 "probable/likely," and 3 to 5 "possible."…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of ADRs was established when the Naranjo's score was Ͼ1 (22). The use of Naranjo's algorithm is limited by the difference in the interpretation of some questions by different investigators (26,27). The WHO adverse reactions terminology (WHO-ART) was used to code and classify ADRs (28).…”
Section: Patients and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sub-analysis showed not only the differences and similarities but also the agreement and correlation between the evaluation systems compared with previous studies. 18,39,40 To find any relationship among the evaluation systems, additional studies to analyse the differences in the scoring systems might be needed in the future. This study has several limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%