2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315081656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causality and Modern Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
102
0
16

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
102
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem remained largely unaddressed for over two millennia but became prominent in philosophical discourse in the XVIII—XIX centuries (Hume, Spinoza, Berkeley, Kant, Descartes, et al). However, it was not until the middle of the last century that the scope of discourse was radically expanded; largely in response to challenges faced in scientific enquiry, where rapidly accumulating data resisted traditional modes of understanding and explanation (e.g., Bunge, 1979; Cushing, 1994; Sloman, 2005). Philosophy was joined by psychology and cognitive science and, more recently, by what could be defined as physics of the mind— an emergent discipline combining statistical physics, information theory and neuroscience to elucidate neuronal underpinnings of cognition (Penrose, 1989, 1994, 1997; Friston et al, 2006; Friston, 2010, 2013).…”
Section: Theories Of Understandingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem remained largely unaddressed for over two millennia but became prominent in philosophical discourse in the XVIII—XIX centuries (Hume, Spinoza, Berkeley, Kant, Descartes, et al). However, it was not until the middle of the last century that the scope of discourse was radically expanded; largely in response to challenges faced in scientific enquiry, where rapidly accumulating data resisted traditional modes of understanding and explanation (e.g., Bunge, 1979; Cushing, 1994; Sloman, 2005). Philosophy was joined by psychology and cognitive science and, more recently, by what could be defined as physics of the mind— an emergent discipline combining statistical physics, information theory and neuroscience to elucidate neuronal underpinnings of cognition (Penrose, 1989, 1994, 1997; Friston et al, 2006; Friston, 2010, 2013).…”
Section: Theories Of Understandingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of well-known principles can apparently be included in the more general principle of causality, which combines phenomena or variations in the state of the system with the conditions that generate this phenomenon [19].…”
Section: Degeneration With Respect To Small Parameters and Coordinatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to explain the necessity of applying the concepts of human life to produce successful design outcomes is to open up the basic metascientifi c diff erence between the logics of the causal natural sciences and intentional human research (Bunge 1959 ;Radnitsky 1968 ;Stegmüller 1969 ;von Wright 1971 ). In causal explanations, the phenomenon that should be explained (i.e., the explanandum) follows the phenomenon that explains (the explanans), but in intentional or teleological explanations, something that happens after the event explains the explanandum (von Wright 1971 ).…”
Section: Towards a New Interaction Design Culturementioning
confidence: 99%