Causality and History: Modes of Causal Investigation in Historical Social Sciences

Abstract

Studies at the confluence of history and social science address issues of causation in three ways: morphological, variable-centered, and genetic. These approaches to causal investigation differ with regard to their modi operandi, the types of patterns they look for, their underlying assumptions and the challenges they face. Morphological inquiries elaborate causal arguments by uncovering patterns in the empirical layout of socio-historical phenomena. To this end, these inquiries draw on descriptive techniques of data formalization. Variable-centered studies engage causal issues by investigating patterns of association among empirical categories under the twofold assumption that these categories a priori have explanatory relevance and each category empirically has the same meaning across cases. Genetic analyses ground their causal claims by identifying patterned processes of emergence or production.

Bloodlines: National Border Crossings and Antisemitism in Weimar Germany

“…Closer inspection of the mechanisms provide an opportunity to elucidate potential scope conditions of the border theory (Ermakoff 2019). The attraction mechanism is activated when border crossings symbolize threats to national security and act as magnets for radical nationalist groups.…”

How rebel groups form in genocide: The Warsaw Ghetto fighters

“…Further, the Jews used the warped Nazi conception of racial identity as a tactical tool; Jews who could appear “Aryan” smuggled resources into ghettos to help the resistance (Einwohner, 2006). Then, correct perception of threat was a key catalyst of armed resistance (Einwohner and Maher, 2011; Soyer, 2014). Finally, experience of selective oppression prompted ghetto resisters to cultivate the skills necessary for effective resistance (Finkel, 2015).…”

Theorizing financial extraction: The curious case of telephone profits in the Los Angeles county jails

“…In simple terms, these are origins stories used to make external validity claims that “x is a thing with the following properties” (Pacewicz, 2020: 9). While such claims are widely used within the historical sociological tradition (Clemens, 2007; Ermakoff, 2019), an important task in such research is to disentangle how origin stories relate to the characteristics of the newly emergent phenomenon (Hirschman and Reed, 2014). As Garland (2014) notes the characteristics that phenomena acquire (i.e.…”