2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4807733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causal structure of oscillations in gene regulatory networks: Boolean analysis of ordinary differential equation attractors

Abstract: A common approach to the modeling of gene regulatory networks is to represent activating or repressing interactions using ordinary differential equations for target gene concentrations that include Hill function dependences on regulator gene concentrations. An alternative formulation represents the same interactions using Boolean logic with time delays associated with each network link. We consider the attractors that emerge from the two types of models in the case of a simple but nontrivial network: a figure-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detailed relation between ABN and a similar approach developed by Thomas and coworkers (Thomas and Richard, 1990) is discussed in a previous publication . Previous work has also shown that the ABN framework employed here can faithfully represent the behavior of differential equation models with sufficiently sharp sigmoidal response functions associated with the links Sun et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The detailed relation between ABN and a similar approach developed by Thomas and coworkers (Thomas and Richard, 1990) is discussed in a previous publication . Previous work has also shown that the ABN framework employed here can faithfully represent the behavior of differential equation models with sufficiently sharp sigmoidal response functions associated with the links Sun et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We reproduce here, with minor adjustments in notation, the description of the ABN modeling framework presented by Sun et al (2013). ABN models, in general, are designed to implement directly the three core features of a regulatory system: (1) the architecture of causal links between regulatory elements; (2) the logic of the response of each element to its regulators; and (3) the times required for targets to respond to changes in the states of their regulators.…”
Section: Appendix a Abn Model Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In certain limits, interactions between network elements become switch–like [Kauffman (1969); Glass (1975,b); Snoussi (1989); Mochizuki (2005); Alon (2006); Mendoza and Xenarios (2006); Davidich and Bornholdt (2008); Wittmann et al (2009); Franke (2010); Veliz-Cuba et al (2012); Casey et al (2006); Sun et al (2013)]. For example, the Hill function, f ( x ) = x n /( x n + J n ), approaches the Heaviside function, H ( x – J ), in the limit of large n , and the domain on which the network is modeled is naturally split into subdomains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boolean networks are seen as a way towards understanding large coupled systems that are too complex to be modeled in every detail, especially including amplitude-specific interactions [Ghi08,Nor07,Rib08,Soc03,Sun13]. For example, simple models such as Boolean networks are helpful in the fields of life sciences and geosciences.…”
Section: Boolean Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%