Causal Learning in Question Quality Improvement

Li, Yichuan; Guo, Ruocheng; Wang, Weiying; Liu, Huan

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49556-5_20

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…On the other hand, there are existing benchmark datasets specifically designed for evaluating tasks in causal inference. Cheng et al [58] provide a comprehensive survey on benchmark datasets for different causal tasks.…”

Section: Datasetsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Causal Interpretability for Machine Learning -- Problems, Methods and Evaluation

Moraffah¹,

Karami²,

Guo³

et al. 2020

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Machine learning models have had discernible achievements in a myriad of applications. However, most of these models are black-boxes, and it is obscure how the decisions are made by them. This makes the models unreliable and untrustworthy. To provide insights into the decision making processes of these models, a variety of traditional interpretable models have been proposed. Moreover, to generate more humanfriendly explanations, recent work on interpretability tries to answer questions related to causality such as "Why does this model makes such decisions?" or "Was it a specific feature that caused the decision made by the model?". In this work, models that aim to answer causal questions are referred to as causal interpretable models. The existing surveys have covered concepts and methodologies of traditional interpretability. In this work, we present a comprehensive survey on causal interpretable models from the aspects of the problems and methods. In addition, this survey provides in-depth insights into the existing evaluation metrics for measuring interpretability, which can help practitioners understand for what scenarios each evaluation metric is suitable.

show abstract

Section: Datasetsmentioning

confidence: 99%