2023
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1132035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causal effects of education attainment on oral and oropharyngeal cancer: New evidence from a meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization study

Abstract: ObjectivesHigher educational attainment (EA) has proven to be beneficial for preventing and treating various types of cancers. Currently, there is little evidence on the association between EA and prevention of oral cavity and pharyngeal cancer (OCPC).MethodsSeveral databases were searched until October 1, 2022, and a meta-analysis was performed. A Mendelian randomization (MR) study was conducted with EA (i.e., the exposure) data derived from the Social Science Genetic Association Consortium and 6,034 cases of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, MR is often likened to a "natural" randomized controlled trial (RCT) because alleles are randomly distributed during gamete production, possibly minimizing confounders and biases due to reverse causality (12). The enduring nature of genetic influences, together with the extensive GWAS data on oral diseases (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19), makes MR studies an effective alternative to conventional, long-term clinical trials focused on preventing oral cancer, avoiding their significant costs and lengthy monitoring periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, MR is often likened to a "natural" randomized controlled trial (RCT) because alleles are randomly distributed during gamete production, possibly minimizing confounders and biases due to reverse causality (12). The enduring nature of genetic influences, together with the extensive GWAS data on oral diseases (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19), makes MR studies an effective alternative to conventional, long-term clinical trials focused on preventing oral cancer, avoiding their significant costs and lengthy monitoring periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%