2023
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.28722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causal effects of COVID‐19 on cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization study

Abstract: In contemporary literature, little attention has been paid to the association between coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and cancer risk. We performed the Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate the causal associations between the three types of COVID-19 exposures (critically ill

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A strong correlation between COVID-19 and GC has been reported[24,26], and in addition, the receptor ACE2 of SARS-CoV-2 infected hosts is expressed in the gastric mucosa[25]. Gastric cancer patients are relatively more susceptible to viral infection than ordinary people after surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A strong correlation between COVID-19 and GC has been reported[24,26], and in addition, the receptor ACE2 of SARS-CoV-2 infected hosts is expressed in the gastric mucosa[25]. Gastric cancer patients are relatively more susceptible to viral infection than ordinary people after surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, several other sensitivity analyses, such as leave-one-out analysis and funnel plots, were applied to identify the presence of heterogeneity and pleiotropy and to assess the robustness of the results. After Bonferroni correction, a P value below 0.008(0.05/6) was considered statistically signi cant and p-value between 0.008 and 0.05 was regarded as suggestive evidence for a potential causal association [33]. All analyses were conducted by using the R package "TwoSampleMR" in R (version 4.2.1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, MR-Egger enables causal analysis through the examination of the slope coefficient, thereby providing an alternative avenue for assessing causality. Conversely, the weighted median method showcases its capacity to compute unbiased estimates, even in the presence of a significant fraction of invalid instrumental variables (IVs) ( 23–25 ). Therefore, given the prevalent use of the IVW in two-sample Mendelian randomization studies, we have utilized IVW as the primary analytical approach, with the remaining four methods serving as supplementary tools to enhance the findings derived from IVW.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%