2022
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1074605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causal association of sleep disturbances and low back pain: A bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Abstract: BackgroundPrevious observational studies have shown that low back pain (LBP) often coexists with sleep disturbances, however, the causal relationship remains unclear. In the present study, the causal relationship between sleep disturbances and LBP was investigated and the importance of sleep improvement in the comprehensive management of LBP was emphasized.MethodsGenetic variants were extracted as instrumental variables (IVs) from the genome-wide association study (GWAS) of insomnia, sleep duration, short slee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These 3 methods differ in their assumptions about the effectiveness of IVs. The IVW method assumes that all included SNPs meet the IVs assumptions; the weighted median method assumes that only 50% of the included SNPs meet the IV assumption 24 ; and MR‐Egger assumes that IVs will affect the outcome through confounding factors in addition to their effect on the exposure, which will result in weaker statistical power 20 . As IVW is currently the most widely accepted method used to determine causation relationships between exposure and outcome, 25,26 we also used IVW as our primary analytical method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These 3 methods differ in their assumptions about the effectiveness of IVs. The IVW method assumes that all included SNPs meet the IVs assumptions; the weighted median method assumes that only 50% of the included SNPs meet the IV assumption 24 ; and MR‐Egger assumes that IVs will affect the outcome through confounding factors in addition to their effect on the exposure, which will result in weaker statistical power 20 . As IVW is currently the most widely accepted method used to determine causation relationships between exposure and outcome, 25,26 we also used IVW as our primary analytical method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All statistical analyses in this study were conducted using R ver. R.4.2.3 with the “TwoSampleMR”, “MVMR”, and “MendelianRandomization” packages 24,35 . Unless specified otherwise, a 2‐tailed P < 0.05 was considered significant for the results 36 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weighted median gives an accurate estimate based on the assumption that the number of valid IVs is 50%. At this point, the causal impact can still be computed accurately (28,29). The MR-Egger regression technique implies that all IVs are invalid, and its estimation accuracy is relatively low (30,31).…”
Section: Mendelian Randomization Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MR-Egger intercept method calculates the intercept term available after the linear regression analysis to determine the likelihood of horizontal pleiotropy (34). The MR-PRESSO examination assesses the total pleiotropy of the study and examines for abnormal SNPs that may have horizontal pleiotropy (28). We utilized the software program to increase the number of distributions in the MR-PRESSO analysis to 5,000 and then performed a global test to notice whether there was pleiotropy in the study.…”
Section: Heterogeneity and Horizontal Pleiotropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple research studies consistently indicate that depression, osteoporosis, and sleep disorders are closely associated with LBP. The presence of sleep disorders such as osteoporosis and depression has been shown to be associated with a higher prevalence of LBP [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%