Causal Association Between Anemia and Cardiovascular Disease: A 2‐Sample Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study

Abstract

Background Although previous observational studies have shown an association between anemia and cardiovascular disease (CVD), the underlying causal relationship between anemia and CVD remains uncertain. Methods and Results We conducted a 2‐sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) study to assess the causal association between anemia and CVD. We extracted summary statistics data for anemia, heart failure (HF), coronary artery disease (CAD), atrial fibrillation, any stroke, and any ischemic stroke (AIS) from relevant published genome‐wide association studies. After rigorous quality control steps, independent single‐nucleotide polymorphisms for each disease were selected as instrumental variables. Inverse‐variance weighting was used as the primary method to estimate the causal association between anemia and CVD in the 2‐sample MR analysis. Simultaneously, we performed a series of multiple methods analyses (median weighting, maximum likelihood [MR robust adjusted profile score]), sensitivity analyses (Cochran's Q test and MR‐Egger intercept, leave‐one‐out test [MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier]), instrumental variable strength evaluations ( F statistic), and statistic power estimates to verify the robustness and reliability of our results. Furthermore, the associations between anemia and CVD from different studies, including the UK Biobank and FinnGen studies, were combined by meta‐analysis. The MR analysis showed that genetically predicted anemia was significantly associated with HF risk at the Bonferroni‐corrected significance level (odds ratio [OR], 1.11 [95% CI, 1.04–1.18]; P =0.002) and was suggestively associated with CAD risk (OR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.02–1.22]; P =0.020). However, the associations between anemia and atrial fibrillation, any stroke, or AIS were not statistically significant. In the reverse MR analysis, we found that genetic susceptibility to HF, CAD, and AIS was significantly associated with anemia risk. The ORs of HF, CAD, and AIS were 1.64 (95% CI, 1.39–1.94; P =7.60E‐09), 1.16 (95% CI, 1.08–1.24; P =2.32E‐05), and 1.30 (95% CI, 1.11–1.52; P =0.001), respectively. Genetically predicted atrial fibrillation was suggestively associated with anemia (OR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.01–1.12]; P =0.015). Sensitivity analyses found weak evidence of horizontal pleiotropy and heterogeneity, which ensured the robustness and reliability of the results. Meta‐analysis also showed the statistically significant association between anemia and HF risk. Conclusions Our study supports bidirectional causality between anemia and HF and significant associations between genetic predisposition to CAD and AIS with anemia, which contributes to the clinical management of both diseases.

Role of Anemia and Leukocytosis as Severity Predictors of Coronary Artery Disease Stenosis : A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study

“…These results align with earlier studies by Lanser et al, which also reported an association between anemia and the progressive severity of CAD (Lanser et al, 2021). Findings in other studies also found a link between anemia and heart disease such as heart failure (Gan et al, 2023)The complex pathophysiological mechanisms underlying anemia in cardiovascular disease and CAD involve a multitude of factors. Anemia initiates immediate hemodynamic shifts, influencing blood viscosity, arterial dilation, vascular resistance, and stroke volume (Metivier et al, 2000).…”

Causal Effects of Basal Metabolic Rate on Cardiovascular Disease: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study

“…In addition, linkage disequilibrium filtering ( r 2 =0.001, window size=10 000 kb) was performed to select independent SNPs. 13 , 14 As F ‐statistics represent the magnitude of the genetic instruments, we calculated SNPs for all included studies to ensure that the F ‐statistics were >10 to minimize weak instrument bias. The F ‐statistics were used for F = R 2 ( N −2)/(1− R 2 ), where R 2 represents the proportion of the variability of the exposure explained by IVs, and N represents the sample size of the GWAS for BMR.…”

Assessing the Association Between Nitrogen Dioxide Air Pollution and the Risk of Schizophreniar’s Disease by Integrating Multigenomics

“…Sensitivity analysis was performed by removing each SNP from the original MR analysis. In the leave-one-out sensitivity analysis we used forest plot to express the results, which can detect whether the results were disproportionately affected by any single SNP (Gan et al, 2023). Finally, heterogeneity evaluation was performed by the inverse variance weighting (IVW) model, and the signi cant threshold was set as P < 0.05 (Riaz et al, 2018).…”