2019
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caught in the “NEET Trap”: The Intersection Between Vocational Inactivity and Disengagement From an Early Intervention Service for Psychosis

Abstract: Objective: Given the benefits of early intervention for psychosis and the social disengagement of youths not in education, employment, or training (NEET), this study sought to examine how being vocationally inactive (NEET) affects engagement in early intervention services. Both baseline vocational status and vocational trajectory in the first year of treatment were analyzed.Methods: Data from 394 patients of a Canadian early intervention service were analyzed using time-to-event and Cox proportional hazards re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…41 Prior FEP research has similarly reported the presence of a substantial patient subpopulation with poor functioning 2 and pointed to such psychosocial disability being stable, and often beginning early in the illness course and even before the formal onset of psychosis. 13,17,19,42,43 In our study, functional recovery status at randomization (the 2-year mark) continued to be a significant predictor of time spent in functional recovery over the subsequent 3 years. The stability in SOFAS scores, with average scores being around the functional recovery point, and employment/education status between Years 2 and 5 suggests a plateauing of gains in functioning that are well known to occur in the first 2 years after initiation of early intervention.…”
Section: Symptom Remission Functional Recovery and Disabilitysupporting
confidence: 46%
“…41 Prior FEP research has similarly reported the presence of a substantial patient subpopulation with poor functioning 2 and pointed to such psychosocial disability being stable, and often beginning early in the illness course and even before the formal onset of psychosis. 13,17,19,42,43 In our study, functional recovery status at randomization (the 2-year mark) continued to be a significant predictor of time spent in functional recovery over the subsequent 3 years. The stability in SOFAS scores, with average scores being around the functional recovery point, and employment/education status between Years 2 and 5 suggests a plateauing of gains in functioning that are well known to occur in the first 2 years after initiation of early intervention.…”
Section: Symptom Remission Functional Recovery and Disabilitysupporting
confidence: 46%
“…Consistent with prior research (Maraj et al, 2019;Maraj, Veru, et al, 2018;Stowkowy et al, 2012), patients were considered disengaged if they had no contact with treating teams for three consecutive months before the completion of treatment, i.e., Month 24. Time to disengagement was recorded as the time from program entry to the first of the three consecutive months of no contact.…”
Section: Service Engagementmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We will treat the pandemic indicator variable as a time-varying predictor with a potential change point on survival analysis. We anticipate a disengagement rate of 15%-20% by 9 months, based on prior data from our own program as well as another Canadian EPI program [ 60 ]. This will provide pilot data for future tests of noninferiority of virtual delivery of NAVIGATE compared to in-person NAVIGATE.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%