2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2020.105622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caught between two continents: First identification of the Ediacaran Central Iapetus Magmatic Province in Western Svalbard with palaeogeographic implications during final Rodinia breakup

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Slagstad et al (2021) correlated the c. 578 Ma Umbukta gabbro in the Rödingsfjellet Nappe Complex of the northern Scandinavian Caledonides, traditionally thought to originate from the Laurentian margin, with the SIP, also suggesting a non-Baltican origin of the SIP magmatism. Gumsley et al (2020) also compare c. 560 Ma alkali and OIB-like mafic rocks from the southwestern province of Svalbard with the SIP, pointing at the difficulties in palaeogeographically reconstructing these occurrences within the wide Baltica-Laurentia-Gondwana system.…”
Section: Magma-rich Margin Sections and The Central Iapetus Magmatic ...mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Slagstad et al (2021) correlated the c. 578 Ma Umbukta gabbro in the Rödingsfjellet Nappe Complex of the northern Scandinavian Caledonides, traditionally thought to originate from the Laurentian margin, with the SIP, also suggesting a non-Baltican origin of the SIP magmatism. Gumsley et al (2020) also compare c. 560 Ma alkali and OIB-like mafic rocks from the southwestern province of Svalbard with the SIP, pointing at the difficulties in palaeogeographically reconstructing these occurrences within the wide Baltica-Laurentia-Gondwana system.…”
Section: Magma-rich Margin Sections and The Central Iapetus Magmatic ...mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For ma tion of the Cen tral Iapetus Mag matic Prov ince (CIMP; so-called East ern Iapetus), as a sec ond phase, took place in a time span of 635-550 Ma, in two stages. The first stage, from 620 to 600 Ma (Gumsley et al, 2020), was char acter ised by con ti nen tal tholeiitic magmatism, of sub con ti nen tal lithospheric man tle der i va tion and ad mix ture of man tle plume (Youbi et al, 2020 and ref er ences therein). The sec ond stage (590-550 Ma) was char ac ter ised by al kali-rich, OIB-like magmatism (Gumsley et al, 2020).…”
Section: Implication For Neoproterozoic Palaeogeographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first stage, from 620 to 600 Ma (Gumsley et al, 2020), was char acter ised by con ti nen tal tholeiitic magmatism, of sub con ti nen tal lithospheric man tle der i va tion and ad mix ture of man tle plume (Youbi et al, 2020 and ref er ences therein). The sec ond stage (590-550 Ma) was char ac ter ised by al kali-rich, OIB-like magmatism (Gumsley et al, 2020). The Tornquist Ocean had not yet opened, de vel op ing at ~550 Ma from a trans form fault (Rob ert et al, 2021).…”
Section: Implication For Neoproterozoic Palaeogeographymentioning
confidence: 99%