Cattle phenotypes can disguise their maternal ancestry

Abstract

BackgroundCattle are bred for, amongst other factors, specific traits, including parasite resistance and adaptation to climate. However, the influence and inheritance of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) are not usually considered in breeding programmes. In this study, we analysed the mtDNA profiles of cattle from Victoria (VIC), southern Australia, which is a temperate climate, and the Northern Territory (NT), the northern part of Australia, which has a tropical climate, to determine if the mtDNA profiles of these cattle are indicative of breed and phenotype, and whether these profiles are appropriate for their environments.ResultsA phylogenetic tree of the full mtDNA sequences of different breeds of cattle, which were obtained from the NCBI database, showed that the mtDNA profiles of cattle do not always reflect their phenotype as some cattle with Bos taurus phenotypes had Bos indicus mtDNA, whilst some cattle with Bos indicus phenotypes had Bos taurus mtDNA. Using D-loop sequencing, we were able to contrast the phenotypes and mtDNA profiles from different species of cattle from the 2 distinct cattle breeding regions of Australia. We found that 67 of the 121 cattle with Bos indicus phenotypes from NT (55.4%) had Bos taurus mtDNA. In VIC, 92 of the 225 cattle with Bos taurus phenotypes (40.9%) possessed Bos indicus mtDNA. When focusing on oocytes from cattle with the Bos taurus phenotype in VIC, their respective oocytes with Bos indicus mtDNA had significantly lower levels of mtDNA copy number compared with oocytes possessing Bos taurus mtDNA (P < 0.01). However, embryos derived from oocytes with Bos indicus mtDNA had the same ability to develop to the blastocyst stage and the levels of mtDNA copy number in their blastocysts were similar to blastocysts derived from oocytes harbouring Bos taurus mtDNA. Nevertheless, oocytes originating from the Bos indicus phenotype exhibited lower developmental potential due to low mtDNA copy number when compared with oocytes from cattle with a Bos taurus phenotype.ConclusionsThe phenotype of cattle is not always related to their mtDNA profiles. MtDNA profiles should be considered for breeding programmes as they also influence phenotypic traits and reproductive capacity in terms of oocyte quality.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12863-017-0523-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The complete mitochondrial genome of Indian gaur, Bos gaurus and its phylogenetic implications

“…It is therefore, possible that mithun individuals analysed in these studies were likely to be the hybrid of domestic mithun and domestic cattle which is prevalent in China 16,56 . Thus, in domestic animals phenotype is not always related to their mitochondrial genome 58 , which leads to phenotypic ambiguity among domestic species and impede conservation efforts. Identification of genetically unique population is critical for species conservation hence, an extensive study is essential to evaluate the cross bred animals on a larger scale using both chromosomal and mitochondrial DNA markers.…”

Diversity of D-loop mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequence in Bali and Sumba Ongole cattle breeds

“…employed to analyze genetic tree and genetic diversity of cattle breeds (Yang et al, 2014;Sharma et al, 2015;Villegas Castagnasso et al, 2015;Srirattana et al, 2017;Pramod et al, 2018;Xia et al, 2019).…”

The association of mitochondrial DNA haplotypes and phenotypic traits in pigs

“…With current breeding approaches, where extensive intra- and inter-breed crossing takes place, an animal’s mtDNA haplotype is no longer indicative of its breed but rather defines its common maternal ancestral origins, as indicated in a previous report on pigs and cattle [ 16 , 27 ]. To this extent, within the population of pigs we analysed, the only consistently shared genetic content amongst each of the animals is likely to be its mtDNA content, which is recycled and passed through the oocytes of maternal relatives from one generation to the next and cannot be altered [ 28 ].…”