2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.137932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cationic surfactants influencing the enhancement of energy efficiency for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) removal in the electrocoagulation-flotation (ECF) system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kishimoto et al claimed that the molar dose of CTAB required to form mixed micelles should be equal or higher than the molar concentration of PFOS, which is the case for this work (CTAB:PFOS/PFOA = 6:1) . The reported molar ratio of CTAB and PFOS/PFOA varies from 1:1 to 20:1, and the optimal ratio might depend strongly on water chemistry such as the ionic strength. ,, The salt (sodium chloride or sodium carbonate) concentrations in those studies are in the range of 2.5–10 mM (around 3 mM in this work for reference). It is important to note that the critical micelle concentrations (CMCs) for single surfactant micelles of PFOS and CTAB are 8 and 0.9 mM, respectively, and their concentrations in this work were below their CMCs; thus, the formation of single surfactant micelles (CTAB micelles or PFOS micelles) does not occur.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kishimoto et al claimed that the molar dose of CTAB required to form mixed micelles should be equal or higher than the molar concentration of PFOS, which is the case for this work (CTAB:PFOS/PFOA = 6:1) . The reported molar ratio of CTAB and PFOS/PFOA varies from 1:1 to 20:1, and the optimal ratio might depend strongly on water chemistry such as the ionic strength. ,, The salt (sodium chloride or sodium carbonate) concentrations in those studies are in the range of 2.5–10 mM (around 3 mM in this work for reference). It is important to note that the critical micelle concentrations (CMCs) for single surfactant micelles of PFOS and CTAB are 8 and 0.9 mM, respectively, and their concentrations in this work were below their CMCs; thus, the formation of single surfactant micelles (CTAB micelles or PFOS micelles) does not occur.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…According to Stellner and co-workers, a mixture of cationic and anionic surfactants can be assembled as mixed micelles . Mixed micelles exhibit spherical amphiphilic structures containing a hydrophobic core and a hydrophilic shell. The latter makes the micelle water soluble, thus limiting its removal from the bulk liquid during bubbling. A schematic of a mixed micelle structure for PFOS/PFOA and CTAB is shown in Figure a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tey carry positively charged ions on their hydrophilic head and can frmly adsorb on the contaminants with negatively charged groups via charge-charge or electrostatic interactions. Te chosen surface-active agents in this experiment work better by providing good solubility and foamability when compared with other types, thereby increasing the fotation efciency better by decreasing CMC formation [27][28][29][30][31][32]. Figure 2 explains the mechanism model of the surface-active agents that tend to be connected with contaminants.…”
Section: Selection Of Surface-active Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%