2018
DOI: 10.30731/ijcps.7.3.2018.51-58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cation Distribution Study of Chromium Substituted Copper Nickel Zinc Ferrite

Abstract: (x = 0.0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 , where a decrease in its value is clearly observed with the increasing Cr 3+ concentration. This effect is due to the smaller ionic radio of Cr 3+ (0.64 Å) in comparison to Fe 3+ (0.67 Å) [33,34] and hence results in more compacts unit cells size with the increases in Cr 3+ content, and therefore, exhibiting a smaller lattice parameter. Further, the crystallite sizes were determined using the Scherrer formula and are shown in figure 3(f) together with average particles size determined from TEM images (figures 3(a)-(e)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 , where a decrease in its value is clearly observed with the increasing Cr 3+ concentration. This effect is due to the smaller ionic radio of Cr 3+ (0.64 Å) in comparison to Fe 3+ (0.67 Å) [33,34] and hence results in more compacts unit cells size with the increases in Cr 3+ content, and therefore, exhibiting a smaller lattice parameter. Further, the crystallite sizes were determined using the Scherrer formula and are shown in figure 3(f) together with average particles size determined from TEM images (figures 3(a)-(e)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%