2018
DOI: 10.1180/mgm.2018.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cation distribution and valence in synthetic Al–Mn–O and Fe–Mn–O spinels under varying conditions

Abstract: The spinel-group minerals, found in a range of igneous rocks, are resistant to weathering and can incorporate several multivalent elements, meaning they have the potential to provide insight into the redox conditions of parental magmas. Naturally occurring spinel can contain varying quantities of Mn, an element which occurs terrestrially and extra-terrestrially as Mn 2+ , Mn 3+ , Mn 4+ and Mn 5+ . However, a lack of information on the effects of oxygen fugacity (f O 2 ) on: (1) Mn valence state and cation dist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rising edge position (determined from the first-derivative maximum of the main absorption edge) was shifted toward higher values in comparison to Mn 0.5 Fe 2.5 O 4 . This indicates more oxidized Mn in the abiotic magnetite samples than in the measured Mn-ferrite reference, which has been shown to contain 25% Mn­(III) and 75% Mn­(II), , while the biological magnetite overlapped the Mn-ferrite reference, which suggests a similar valence for Mn. Therefore, based on the shift of the absorption edge position, the Mn­(III)/Mn total ratios in the abiotic and biologic magnetites were taken as 0.3 (i.e., higher than that of the Mn-ferrite reference) and 0.25 (i.e., similar to that of the Mn-ferrite reference), respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rising edge position (determined from the first-derivative maximum of the main absorption edge) was shifted toward higher values in comparison to Mn 0.5 Fe 2.5 O 4 . This indicates more oxidized Mn in the abiotic magnetite samples than in the measured Mn-ferrite reference, which has been shown to contain 25% Mn­(III) and 75% Mn­(II), , while the biological magnetite overlapped the Mn-ferrite reference, which suggests a similar valence for Mn. Therefore, based on the shift of the absorption edge position, the Mn­(III)/Mn total ratios in the abiotic and biologic magnetites were taken as 0.3 (i.e., higher than that of the Mn-ferrite reference) and 0.25 (i.e., similar to that of the Mn-ferrite reference), respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…K-edge XAS for Mn-doped abiotic magnetite (Figure A) has near-edge structural features that resemble a Mn 0.5 Fe 2.5 O 4 reference (where Mn is a mixture of Mn­(II) located in tetrahedral sites and Mn­(III) in octahedral sites). Comparison with Mn-based oxides shows an oxidation state between Mn­(II) and Mn­(III) but closer to MnO. This is reflected by the position of the main rising edge (Figure S5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…4A, inset). Near-edge features of Mn-doped magnetite correspond more so with a Mn-ferrite reference (Mn0.5Fe2.5O4) 22 indicating similar chemical and structural environment. However, weaker pre-edge and post-edge features (6562 eV) potentially originate from the dilute and inhomogenous nature of the dopant metal in the magnetite lattice compared to the Mn-ferrite reference.…”
Section: Crystal Field Constraints On Element Incorporation Into Magnetite and Coordination Of 3d Metals In Magnetitementioning
confidence: 75%
“…Since the valence state also affects the properties of the spinel, it is fundamental to estimate the average valence state when present mixed spinels. By intensity ratios of X-Ray diffraction planes sensitive to cation distribution; which is an easiest and more reliable technique rather than neutron diffraction, Mossbauer spectroscopy or X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In batteries one aspect that might dictate the electrochemical behavior of the spinel in the electrochemical cell is the cation distribution of the atoms in the structure since a redox couple and the valence of the transition metals tends to change to lower or higher average valence. Then, to study the cation distribution of these spinels we developed a 2 more accurate method to approximate the cation distribution based on the works of Bertaut et al, Ashish and Hiren, Siva Ram Prasad et al and Lakhani et al [3,9,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%