1997
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1996.4752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cation Binding Predictions of Surface Complexation Models: Effects of pH, Ionic Strength, Cation Loading, Surface Complex, and Model Fit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
68
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the presence of coions in the β-plane in the absence of positively-charged surface functional groups contradicts the TLM and most other EDL models (a notable exception being the modified TLM of Robertson and Leckie [15]), but agrees with the results of all-atom theoretical calculations [98]. We hypothesize that the few Cl -OSSCs observed in our simulations may in fact be stabilized as positively-charged ion pairs, CaCl + .…”
Section: Coion Exclusionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the presence of coions in the β-plane in the absence of positively-charged surface functional groups contradicts the TLM and most other EDL models (a notable exception being the modified TLM of Robertson and Leckie [15]), but agrees with the results of all-atom theoretical calculations [98]. We hypothesize that the few Cl -OSSCs observed in our simulations may in fact be stabilized as positively-charged ion pairs, CaCl + .…”
Section: Coion Exclusionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…By analogy with planar capacitors, these parameters are sometimes modeled with the relation [4,32]: Yates et al [3] using the unsupported assumption that ψ d is equal to the electrokinetic "zeta" potential [16,31]) and fitting C 1 to proton and electrolyte adsorption data using the TLM; this method yields C 1 = 0.6 to 2.2 for a range of electrolytes and mineral surfaces [15,[31][32][33]104,125]. Other studies have assumed that C 2 = ∞ (i.e., ψβ = ψ d [107]) or C 2 = C 1 [7,126], or have fitted both C 1 and C 2 [105,107].…”
Section: Implications For Modeling Mineral-water Interfacial Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Robertson and Leckie (1996) systematically examined the effects of SCM model choice on cation binding predictions when pH, ionic strength, cation loading and proposed surface complex stoichiometry were varied. They show that although different models can be used to obtain comparable fits to the same experimental data set, the stoichiometry of the proposed surface complex will vary considerably between the models.…”
Section: Constantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can explain the adsorption of ions in aqueous solution on solid surfaces phenomenon, since its nature is more chemical than physical. The model proved to be applicable for various adsorption systems 3,4,5,6 . Modeling of noble metal complex ions adsorbed onto single oxides has been given more attention than composite oxides, although the latter are used in many industries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%