1988
DOI: 10.14315/arg-1988-jg10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catholic Controversial Literature, 1518-1555: Some Statistics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using Klaiber's data, in two major publications (1988, 1994) Mark U. Edwards stressed the relative paucity of anti‐Reformation texts produced in German‐speaking lands as a whole, and the extent to which they were dwarfed by the flood of pro‐reformer writings, often at a rate of 1:5. Edwards suggested that this was the result of institutional and cultural obstacles to ‘Catholic controversialist’ printing, such as a lack of patronage for polemicists, and anxieties about debating openly with heretics. Using an alternative dataset, however, Richard Crofts (1985) offered a different reading, concluding that in Germany ‘after 1525, the number of Catholic publications was surprisingly high, nearly matching the total of the reformers’.…”
Section: Anti‐reformation Polemic Composed In Poland 1517–39mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using Klaiber's data, in two major publications (1988, 1994) Mark U. Edwards stressed the relative paucity of anti‐Reformation texts produced in German‐speaking lands as a whole, and the extent to which they were dwarfed by the flood of pro‐reformer writings, often at a rate of 1:5. Edwards suggested that this was the result of institutional and cultural obstacles to ‘Catholic controversialist’ printing, such as a lack of patronage for polemicists, and anxieties about debating openly with heretics. Using an alternative dataset, however, Richard Crofts (1985) offered a different reading, concluding that in Germany ‘after 1525, the number of Catholic publications was surprisingly high, nearly matching the total of the reformers’.…”
Section: Anti‐reformation Polemic Composed In Poland 1517–39mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Edwards suggested that this was the result of institutional and cultural obstacles to ‘Catholic controversialist’ printing, such as a lack of patronage for polemicists, and anxieties about debating openly with heretics. Using an alternative dataset, however, Richard Crofts (1985) offered a different reading, concluding that in Germany ‘after 1525, the number of Catholic publications was surprisingly high, nearly matching the total of the reformers’. In a major subsequent intervention in 2004, Andrew Pettegree and Matthew Hall used the Index Aureliensis catalogue of sixteenth‐century books to argue forcefully that the early modern European book‐market consisted of a series of distinct local markets and industries, which should not necessarily be judged against (and especially not judged as deficient against) a German ‘norm’.…”
Section: Anti‐reformation Polemic Composed In Poland 1517–39mentioning
confidence: 99%