2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1201-9712(01)90095-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catheter-related bacteremia caused by Roseomonas gilardii in an immunocompromised patient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6,7 In children, only few sporadic cases of Roseomonas isolation have been reported, some being incompletely documented or corresponding to transient colonization. [12][13][14] In 2006, McLean et al 14 reviewed 7 pediatric cases of catheter-related bacteremia involving Roseomonas gilardii (n = 3), Roseomonas sp. (n = 3), and Roseomonas fauriae (n = 1) identified by phenotypic methods.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6,7 In children, only few sporadic cases of Roseomonas isolation have been reported, some being incompletely documented or corresponding to transient colonization. [12][13][14] In 2006, McLean et al 14 reviewed 7 pediatric cases of catheter-related bacteremia involving Roseomonas gilardii (n = 3), Roseomonas sp. (n = 3), and Roseomonas fauriae (n = 1) identified by phenotypic methods.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outcome was favorable in all cases reviewed here (Table 1) In children with ALL, 3 cases of Roseomonas bacteremia have been previously reported and attributed to an unidentified species (n = 1) 12 and to R. gilardii (n = 2). 12,13 However, identification should be considered with caution because the isolates have been identified by phenotypic means only and cases have been reported before the R. mucosa characterization in 2003. 7 Common features were the fever upon Roseomonas isolation and the favorable outcome under treatment including an association of ceftazidime and gentamicin or amikacin.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, infections due to Roseomonas spp. are distinctly rare in the pediatric population, with a total of seven cases reported to date; R. gilardii was identified in three, R. fauriae was identified in one, and three were reported as species unknown (6,7,13). To our knowledge, R. mucosa has not been identified in any pediatric patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…7 The agar gradient diffusion (Etest) method has also been employed for determining in vitro susceptibilities. 8,14,16 Since there are no published methodological guidelines or interpretive breakpoints for minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) specific for Roseomonas spp., there are no recommendations for clinical laboratories to perform in vitro susceptibilities for individual patient management. If susceptibility testing is performed, it is best to limit reports to the MIC value and not provide an interpretation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%