2000
DOI: 10.1067/mpd.2000.107164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catheter interventional treatment in Kawasaki disease: A report from the Japanese Pediatric Interventional Cardiology Investigation Group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
53
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have demonstrated that PBA is effective for patients within 6 years of the onset of KD, but at Ͼ6 years after onset, it is less effective. 5,8,15 In the present study, PBA successfully resolved stenotic lesions in 3 patients for whom the time since onset of KD had been Ͻ4 years. There have been a few reports in which stent implantation, a technique of coronary intervention commonly performed in adult patients, was applied to KD patients.…”
Section: Discussion Comparison With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have demonstrated that PBA is effective for patients within 6 years of the onset of KD, but at Ͼ6 years after onset, it is less effective. 5,8,15 In the present study, PBA successfully resolved stenotic lesions in 3 patients for whom the time since onset of KD had been Ͻ4 years. There have been a few reports in which stent implantation, a technique of coronary intervention commonly performed in adult patients, was applied to KD patients.…”
Section: Discussion Comparison With Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Our proposed criteria for device selection are summarized here on the basis of the results from present and previous studies. [5][6][7][8][9][15][16][17] It is well known that PBA alone is less effective for long-term lesions with severe calcification. [5][6][7][8][9] Half of all coronary artery stenotic lesions, however, occur within 2 years of KD onset.…”
Section: Selection Of An Appropriate Device For Catheter Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 However, the incidence of coronary revascularization was not investigated. A national survey of catheter interventions after kDa was reported in 2000, 4 whereas a previous multicenter cooperative study for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after kDa in Japan was performed in 1991. 5 After that survey, it was unknown how many patients underwent CABG for coronary arterial lesions caused by kDa.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] In contrast, drug-coated balloons (DCB) now play a central role in the treatment of in-stent restenosis through their inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia, despite the lack of evidence for de novo coronary artery disease. 7,8) We describe here our experience with an atherosclerotic-restenosis case of probable coronary sequelae of KD previously treated with rotational atherectomy with additional low-pressure balloon dilation 6 months before, 3) in which rotational atherectomy followed by DCB dilation could defer any subsequent repeat intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Since these stiff calcified lesions have risk of stent underexpansion and neo-aneurysmal formation ascribed to high-pressure balloon inflation, rotational atherectomy with/without additional low-pressure balloon dilation alone has been a mainstay of interventional treatment for stenosis due to the coronary sequelae of KD. [4][5][6] In contrast, drug-coated balloons (DCB) now play a central role in the treatment of in-stent restenosis through their inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia, despite the lack of evidence for de novo coronary artery disease. 7,8) We describe here our experience with an atherosclerotic-restenosis case of probable coronary sequelae of KD previously treated with rotational atherectomy with additional low-pressure balloon dilation 6 months before, 3) in which rotational atherectomy followed by DCB dilation could defer any subsequent repeat intervention.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%