2017
DOI: 10.1111/nph.14904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caterpillars induce jasmonates in flowers and alter plant responses to a second attacker

Abstract: Summary In nature, herbivorous insects and plant pathogens are generally abundant when plants are flowering. Thus, plants face a diversity of attackers during their reproductive phase. Plant responses to one attacker can interfere with responses to a second attacker, and phytohormones that orchestrate plant reproduction are also involved in resistance to insect and pathogen attack. We quantified phytohormonal responses of flowering plants exposed to single or dual attack and studied resistance mechanisms of pl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
63
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
2
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because defense induction varies considerably through time and across larval instars, (Clavijo McCormick et al 2014, Chr etien et al 2017, the limited exposure to caterpillars in the field experiment likely underestimates both the direct effects of induced secondary metabolites on aphids in the field and the indirect effects mediated by volatile induction. In the absence of natural enemies in the greenhouse, caterpillar feeding reduced aphid densities, consistent with asymmetrical competition arising from induced defenses in response to chewing injury (reviewed in Z€ ust and Agrawal 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because defense induction varies considerably through time and across larval instars, (Clavijo McCormick et al 2014, Chr etien et al 2017, the limited exposure to caterpillars in the field experiment likely underestimates both the direct effects of induced secondary metabolites on aphids in the field and the indirect effects mediated by volatile induction. In the absence of natural enemies in the greenhouse, caterpillar feeding reduced aphid densities, consistent with asymmetrical competition arising from induced defenses in response to chewing injury (reviewed in Z€ ust and Agrawal 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, the duration of chewing herbivory treatments was much shorter in the field experiment (72 h) compared with the greenhouse experiment (larvae fed until pupation). Because defense induction varies considerably through time and across larval instars, (Clavijo McCormick et al 2014, Chr etien et al 2017, the limited exposure to caterpillars in the field experiment likely underestimates both the direct effects of induced secondary metabolites on aphids in the field and the indirect effects mediated by volatile induction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is both invigorating and rewarding, which is apparent in both his experimental (Schiestl et al ., ) and theoretical work (Schiestl, ). Some more recent papers I wish to highlight are the works by Øystein H. Opedal on the evolutionary potential of plant traits (Opedal, ), and by Lucille Chretién and colleagues on plant‐mediated interactions with flowering plants (Chrétien et al ., ). Both papers highlight the fact that flowers are unique plant organs, and although plants function as one integrated unit, plant responses to herbivory are different in flowers compared to leaves (Chrétien et al ., ), and flowers have different evolutionary potential compared to vegetative tissues (Opedal, ).…”
Section: What Are Your Favourite New Phytologist Papers Of Recent Yeamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Future challenges include the following: 1 To integrate species interactions and related traits in multitrophic-multitrait systems at the scale of the entire community. Integrating studies of plant defence and plant reproduction will help to understand the factors that influence interactions of plants with various interactants (Lucas- Barbosa et al, 2016;Chr etien et al, 2018). Ideally, such approach should map the various effectors and elicitors from each partner acting across the networks.…”
Section: Future Promises and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 To connect plant defence and reproduction. Integrating studies of plant defence and plant reproduction will help to understand the factors that influence interactions of plants with various interactants (Lucas- Barbosa et al, 2016;Chr etien et al, 2018). One important challenge nowadays is to understand pollinator decline (Biesmeijer et al, 2006), or even insect declines in general (Hallmann et al, 2017;Vogel, 2017) and the decline of ecosystem services such as pollination.…”
Section: Future Promises and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%