Category structure determines the relative attractiveness of global versus local averages.

Abstract

Stimuli that capture the central tendency of presented exemplars are often preferred-a phenomenon also known as the classic . However, recent studies have shown that this effect can reverse under certain conditions. We propose that a key variable for such is the category structure of the presented exemplars. When exemplars cluster into multiple subcategories, the global average should no longer reflect the underlying stimulus distributions, and will thereby become unattractive. In contrast, the subcategory averages (i.e., local averages) should better reflect the stimulus distributions, and become more attractive. In 3 studies, we presented participants with dot patterns belonging to 2 different subcategories. Importantly, across studies, we also manipulated the distinctiveness of the subcategories. We found that participants preferred the local averages over the global average when they first learned to classify the patterns into 2 different subcategories in a contrastive categorization paradigm (Experiment 1). Moreover, participants still preferred local averages when first classifying patterns into a single category (Experiment 2) or when not classifying patterns at all during incidental learning (Experiment 3), as long as the subcategories were sufficiently distinct. Finally, as a proof-of-concept, we mapped our empirical results onto predictions generated by a well-known computational model of category learning (the Generalized Context Model [GCM]). Overall, our findings emphasize the key role of categorization for understanding the nature of preferences, including any effects that emerge from stimulus averaging. (PsycINFO Database Record

From likely to likable: The role of statistical typicality in human social assessment of faces

“…Notably, we expect rapid dynamic modulation of stimulus representation to be primarily applicable in the case of featural dimensions that are ecologically relevant (such as those discriminating race and gender). Such dynamic modulation may also be possible for arbitrary featural dimensions but, as logic would suggest and empirical evidence concurs (18,28), would require extensive additional training. It would be interesting to test in future work whether UiA can also be causally induced by newly learned multimodal distributions (18,28).…”

“…1B). Indeed, empirical studies show that cross-category blends [e.g., biracial (26), bigender (27) faces, and cross-category synthetic stimuli (28)] elicit lower attractiveness ratings than samecategory blends, but only in the relevant categorization context (outside the relevant categorization context, these stimuli A B C Fig. 1.…”

Ambiguous at the second sight: Mixed facial expressions trigger late electrophysiological responses linked to lower social impressions

“…For example, it is important to know whether the current results are limited to facial emotion stimuli or extend to ethnicity-ambiguous, gender-ambiguous, or identity-ambiguous faces. Given previous research showing preferences for unambiguous patterns, they also could extend to nonfacial stimuli (Vogel, Carr, Davis, & Winkielman, 2018;Winkielman et al, 2006). It also would be important to combine EEG and EMG measures to examine relations between brain (LPP) responses and peripheral affective (facial EMG) responses and thus to understand better the mechanisms generating the aversive nature of ambiguity.…”

Beauty-in-averageness and its contextual modulations: A Bayesian statistical account

“…We will first present a very simple, abstract model in section 4.1 that captures both BiA and as well as UiA in various contexts. The simplicity of this model is deliberate in that it is meant to be both expository as well as demonstrating the generality of our proposal, since BiA and UiA are not specific to faces [10,43,41]. In section 4.2, we use a data-driven face space representation for further validation.…”