2022
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2022.3219853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Category-Level Adversaries for Outdoor LiDAR Point Clouds Cross-Domain Semantic Segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our method demonstrates a significant 9.2% improvement in performance over LiDomAug, which relies on ego-motion and multi-frame information, highlighting its robustness and effectiveness. Moreover, although our approach falls short by 5.9% compared to the latest DA technique, DCFNet [8], in the (N→K) scenario, it excels in the (K→N) scenario, outperforming DCFNet by 13.9%. The qualitative results, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison To State-of-the-art Da/dg Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our method demonstrates a significant 9.2% improvement in performance over LiDomAug, which relies on ego-motion and multi-frame information, highlighting its robustness and effectiveness. Moreover, although our approach falls short by 5.9% compared to the latest DA technique, DCFNet [8], in the (N→K) scenario, it excels in the (K→N) scenario, outperforming DCFNet by 13.9%. The qualitative results, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison To State-of-the-art Da/dg Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…2) Experiments in the LiDomAug Setting: We benchmark the proposed method against various augmentation methods, including CutMix [44], Copy-Paste [45], Mix3D [37], Po-larMix [46], and domain adaptation methods like SWD [47], 3DGCA [25], Complete & Label [11], LiDAR-UDA [30], CLAN [42], FADA [41], DAST [43] and DCFNet [8]. We employ the experimental setting proposed by LiDomAug [12], using SemanticKITTI [5] and nuScenes [6] datasets.…”
Section: Comparison To State-of-the-art Da/dg Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations