2011
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2010.492994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Category induction in autism: Slower, perhaps different, but certainly possible

Abstract: Available studies on categorization in autism indicate possibly intact category formation, performed through atypical processes. Category learning was investigated in 16 high-functioning autistic and 16 IQ-matched nonautistic participants, using a category structure that could generate a conflict between the application of a rule and exemplar memory. Same-different and matching-to-sample tasks allowed us to verify discrimination abilities for the stimuli to be used in category learning. Participants were then … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, normal perceptual and conceptual priming have been reported in studies using words or pictures or music as stimuli (Bowler, Matthews, & Gardiner, 1997;Gardiner, Bowler, & Grice, 2003;Heaton, Williams, Cummins, & Happé, 2007;Renner et al, 2000;Toichi, 2008). Implicit category formation was unimpaired in a study by Molesworth, Bowler, and Hampton (2005) and unimpaired, although possibly atypically achieved, in studies by Bott, Brock, Brockdorff, Boucher, and Lamberts (2006) and by Soulières, Mottron, Giguère, & Larochelle (2011). Implicit learning of spatial context was unimpaired in a study by Barnes et al (2008).…”
Section: Nondeclarative Memorymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, normal perceptual and conceptual priming have been reported in studies using words or pictures or music as stimuli (Bowler, Matthews, & Gardiner, 1997;Gardiner, Bowler, & Grice, 2003;Heaton, Williams, Cummins, & Happé, 2007;Renner et al, 2000;Toichi, 2008). Implicit category formation was unimpaired in a study by Molesworth, Bowler, and Hampton (2005) and unimpaired, although possibly atypically achieved, in studies by Bott, Brock, Brockdorff, Boucher, and Lamberts (2006) and by Soulières, Mottron, Giguère, & Larochelle (2011). Implicit learning of spatial context was unimpaired in a study by Barnes et al (2008).…”
Section: Nondeclarative Memorymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Poorer categorization performance (in terms of slower initial category learning, classification of distorted exemplars, or prototype formation) by individuals with ASD has been observed in studies using continuously varying stimuli (Bott et al, 2006;Church et al, 2010;Froehlich et al, 2012;Gastgeb et al, 2009Gastgeb et al, , 2011Gastgeb et al, , 2012Plaisted, 2000). Two other categorization studies, using discretely different exemplars, have found no categorization differences in ASD (Molesworth et al, 2005) or slower learning but comparable ability to utilize a categorization rule (Soulières et al, 2011a).…”
Section: Action 2: Noise Encourages Transitions Between Neural Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In assessing the extent to which the RGT correctly accounts for some evidence of reduced gestalt grouping by similarity among autistic people (Bolte et al, 2007;Falter et al, 2010), difficulties in accounting for a quasi-typical categorization performance (Molesworth et al, 2005;Soulières et al, 2011b) and the often replicated enhanced performance on pattern matching tasks (for a review, see Mottron et al, 2013a) must be considered. Accordingly, embedded figures, visual search, mental rotation, and block design tasks all imply detection of a similarity between a probe and a target.…”
Section: Reduced Generalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%