Categorizing and assessing comprehensive drivers of provider behavior for optimizing quality of health care

Abstract

Inadequate quality of care in healthcare facilities is one of the primary causes of patient mortality in low- and middle-income countries, and understanding the behavior of healthcare providers is key to addressing it. Much of the existing research concentrates on improving resource-focused issues, such as staffing or training, but these interventions do not fully close the gaps in quality of care. By contrast, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the full contextual and internal drivers–such as social norms, beliefs, and emotions–that influence the clinical behaviors of healthcare providers. We aimed to provide two conceptual frameworks to identify such drivers, and investigate them in a facility setting where inadequate quality of care is pronounced. Using immersion interviews and a novel decision-making game incorporating concepts from behavioral science, we systematically and qualitatively identified an extensive set of contextual and internal behavioral drivers in staff nurses working in reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health (RMNCH) in government public health facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India. We found that the nurses operate in an environment of stress, blame, and lack of control, which appears to influence their perception of their role as often significantly different from the RMNCH program’s perspective. That context influences their perceptions of risk for themselves and for their patients, as well as self-efficacy beliefs, which could lead to avoidance of responsibility, or incorrect care. A limitation of the study is its use of only qualitative methods, which provide depth, rather than prevalence estimates of findings. This exploratory study identified previously under-researched contextual and internal drivers influencing the care-related behavior of staff nurses in public facilities in Uttar Pradesh. We recommend four types of interventions to close the gap between actual and target behaviors: structural improvements, systemic changes, community-level shifts, and interventions within healthcare facilities.

From the frontlines to centre stage: resilience of frontline health workers in the context of COVID-19

“… 10–12 CHWs are often publicly admonished by punitive supervisors, compensated via incentives and honoraria (as opposed to fair wages), and receive woefully delayed payments. 6 , 13 , 14 Despite these issues, we find no evidence that low performance stems from the fact that CHWs shirk their duties. For example, in Bihar, we found that 90% of CHWs undertook the processes required to facilitate service delivery, including creating a home visit plan, surveying pregnant women and children and supporting the preparation of due lists.…”

Provider performance and facility readiness for managing infections in young infants in primary care facilities in rural Bangladesh

“…Most often, there is only one SACMO posted and available to treat pediatric patients at the UH&FWC. Thus, the individual knowledge and opinions of this provider will influence adoption and adherence to the guidelines [37,38]. To aid these workers in identifying sick infants, the Bangladesh guidelines include a clinical algorithm for classifying signs of infection in young infants, guidance on antibiotic treatment, referral advice and follow-up [22].…”

Developing a framework for cash transfer programs that foster sustained economic empowerment to reduce sexual risk among adolescent girls and young women: a qualitative study

“…EthnoLab is a scenario-based behavioral decision-making game (in this case presented as a board game), with qualitative follow-up discussions, to understand the contexts, emotions, and mental models that influence decision-making. EthnoLab was developed by Final Mile Consulting and has been successfully applied in several projects across the African continent, India, and the US [ 11 , 12 ]. Content analysis of the results of EthnoLab was then used to inform the design of a CT program framework (Fig.…”