2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2020.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Categorization of pedestrian level of service perceptions and accounting its response heterogeneity and latent correlation on travel decisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…People who felt that the infrastructure for non-motorised transport is insufficient, are less likely to choose NMT. This negative influence of absence of infrastructure on NMT usage has been elicited in previous studies also Jain and Tiwari, 2016 , Makarewicz, 2018 , Rahul and Manoj, 2020 , Rahul and Verma, 2013 , Verma, 2016 . Further, respondents of occupation category 1 have a lesser utility from NMT when compared to students and free lancers.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…People who felt that the infrastructure for non-motorised transport is insufficient, are less likely to choose NMT. This negative influence of absence of infrastructure on NMT usage has been elicited in previous studies also Jain and Tiwari, 2016 , Makarewicz, 2018 , Rahul and Manoj, 2020 , Rahul and Verma, 2013 , Verma, 2016 . Further, respondents of occupation category 1 have a lesser utility from NMT when compared to students and free lancers.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Re-coding of the dependent variable was deemed necessary in response to these changes. The interval for LOS A-C suggests that this LOS range was acceptable to pedestrians, while the interval for LOS D-F indicates that the users were dissatisfied [9]. The recoded rating is presented in Table 6.…”
Section: Phase Iv: Assessment Of the Developed Predictive Mathematica...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional transportation planning tends to undervalue the importance of considering walkability, precisely the qualitative characteristics of walking as perceived by pedestrians [7,8]. In fact, several studies proved that those factors could also contribute to the pedestrian level of service [8], and can actually be the key answer that may potentially encourage individuals to use it [9]. In the analysis of Amprasi et al (2022), comparing micro-simulated PLOS to user perception, the study led to an interesting result: contrary to the high level of service calculated through simulation models, a significant number of pedestrian users still feel uncomfortable and unsafe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A wide range of literature is available which attempt to provide guidelines for LOS assessment of pedestrian facilities [1,15,[16][17][18][19]. Researchers have focused on providing separate LOS assessment guidelines for sidewalks [20], mid-block crossings [16] and for pedestrian movements along the carriageway where well defined pedestrian facilities are not available [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%