Papers in Honour of Bernhard Banaschewski 2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-2529-3_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Categories of Relations and Functional Relations

Abstract: Abstract. We define relations and their composition in a category with (£,.M)-factorization structure, with M consisting of monomorphisms, but S not restricted to epimorphisms. We obtain an associativity criterion for composition of relations, and we study functional and induced relations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is controllable if gcd(B2, C1) = 1. Given the observability assumption, this implies gcd(C 2 B2, B 1 C1) = 1, and so the interconnected behaviour C • B represented by (8) is controllable.…”
Section: Comparison To Matrix Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…is controllable if gcd(B2, C1) = 1. Given the observability assumption, this implies gcd(C 2 B2, B 1 C1) = 1, and so the interconnected behaviour C • B represented by (8) is controllable.…”
Section: Comparison To Matrix Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Composition is given by pushout, as in the category of cospans, followed by factorising the copairing of the resulting cospan. This is a dualisation of a well-known construction of relations from spans [8]; the details can be found in [7]. mapping a cospan to its jointly-epic counterpart given by the factorisation system.…”
Section: Corelationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, call a cospan X → N ← Y jointly epic if the induced morphism X + Y → N is an epimorphism. If monomorphisms in C are preserved under pushout, we may construct a symmetric monoidal category Corel(C) with objects again those of C, but this time morphisms isomorphism classes of jointly epic cospans in C, and composition taking the pushout of representative cospans, before corestricting to the jointly epic part [Mi00,JW96]. 2 The unitors, associator, and braiding are inherited from C.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally, a category of corelations may be constructed from any finitely cocomplete category equipped with a (E, M)-factorisation system such that M is preserved under pushout[JW96]. In related papers, we have shown that this construction can be used to model interconnection of 'black-boxed' systems; that is, to model systems in which only the internal structure is obscured, leaving only the external behaviour[BF, FRS, Fo].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This category inherits from the bicategory Span(C) the structure of a (strict) 2-category, with 2-cells given by order; actually, Rel(C) is the prototypical example of a (unitary and tabular) allegory: see [Freyd, Scedrov 1990], [Johnstone 2002]. More generally, as done in [Pavlović 1995] (with predecessors of this work presented under more restrictive conditions in [Klein 1970] and [Meisen 1974], and with a weakening of the pullback-stability constraint given in [Jayewardene, Wyler 1996]), without any epior mono restrictions one may consider an arbitrary stable factorization system (E, M) of a category C with binary products and pullbacks and form the category…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%