2000
DOI: 10.1017/9780511608667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Categories and Modules with K-Theory in View

Abstract: From reader reviews:Christopher Olsen:Do you considered one of people who can't read pleasurable if the sentence chained in the straightway, hold on guys this kind of aren't like that. This Categories and Modules with K-Theory in View (Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics) 1st edition by Berrick, A. J., Keating, M. E. (2000) Hardcover book is readable by means of you who hate the straight word style. You will find the info here are arrange for enjoyable reading through experience without leaving perhaps … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the category G-RING has arbitrary direct limits. The following lemma is a graded version of a well-known result (see [10,Prop. 5.2.14]).…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other words, the category G-RING has arbitrary direct limits. The following lemma is a graded version of a well-known result (see [10,Prop. 5.2.14]).…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A full matrix ring over R is von Neumann regular if and only if R is von Neumann regular. Moreover, recall that unital von Neumann regular rings are closed under direct limits (see[10, Prop. 5.2.14]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof is similar to that of ( [14], Lemma 4.5). we recover the definition of Lie modules ( [15][16][17]).…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We remark that B and U are adjoint functors (see [14,Proposition 3.3.15]). We know that B restricts to a functor between the categories of finitely presented modules and, by Proposition 5.9(1), the same applies to the subcategories of finite length modules.…”
Section: The Category Of Finitely Presented Modules As a Quotient Catmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. Recall that two categories are equivalent if and only if there is a full, faithful and dense functor between them (see [14,Proposition 1.3.14]). By Proposition 6.2, the functor B satisfies the same natural property than T up to natural isomorphism, hence B is a category equivalence.…”
Section: The Category Of Finitely Presented Modules As a Quotient Catmentioning
confidence: 99%