2010
DOI: 10.1038/nn.2641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Categorical speech representation in human superior temporal gyrus

Abstract: Speech perception requires the rapid and effortless extraction of meaningful phonetic information from a highly variable acoustic signal. A powerful example of this phenomenon is categorical speech perception, in which a continuum of acoustically varying sounds is transformed into perceptually distinct phoneme categories. Here we show that the neural representation of speech sounds is categorically organized in the human posterior superior temporal gyrus. Using intracranial high-density cortical surface arrays… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

48
486
6
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 501 publications
(563 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(25 reference statements)
48
486
6
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Macaque PET imaging suggests there is also an evolutionary predisposition to left-hemisphere processing for conspecific communication calls (60). Consistent with macaque electrophysiology, human electrocorticography recordings from superior temporal gyrus (STG), in the region immediately posterior to the anterior-lateral aspect of Heschl's gyrus (i.e., mid-STG), show the site to code for phoneme identity at the population level (61). Mid-STG is also the site of peak high-gamma activity in response to CV sounds (62)(63)(64).…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Macaque PET imaging suggests there is also an evolutionary predisposition to left-hemisphere processing for conspecific communication calls (60). Consistent with macaque electrophysiology, human electrocorticography recordings from superior temporal gyrus (STG), in the region immediately posterior to the anterior-lateral aspect of Heschl's gyrus (i.e., mid-STG), show the site to code for phoneme identity at the population level (61). Mid-STG is also the site of peak high-gamma activity in response to CV sounds (62)(63)(64).…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…P, posterior; A, anterior; L, left; R, right. Poldrack, 2007;Desai et al, 2008;Hutchison et al, 2008;Chang et al, 2010;Zevin et al, 2010;Kilian-Hütten et al, 2011). Nevertheless, theories implicating sensorimotor mapping in speech sound categorization (Devlin and Aydelott, 2009) suggest frontal regions should be involved as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The left posterior STG has been implicated in categorical phoneme perception by functional imaging (Husain et al, 2006;Desai et al, 2008;Hutchison et al, 2008) and intracranial human electrophysiology studies (Chang et al, 2010). The supramarginal gyrus (SMG) has also been implicated in categorical speech perception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also show sensitivity to tiny acoustic differences that the father may not be able to consciously perceive and that may not even be important for understanding the message. 5,6 As the neural processing advances away from his superior temporal gyrus to other areas in the temporal lobe and toward left frontal brain areas, the representation of sounds appears to lose some of the fine-grained acoustic detail. Instead, it seems to represent something closer to what he actually is aware of hearing.…”
Section: The Lack Of Invariance Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%