2014
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781107261457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Categorical Homotopy Theory

Abstract: This book develops abstract homotopy theory from the categorical perspective, with a particular focus on examples. Part I discusses two competing perspectives by which one typically first encounters homotopy (co)limits: either as derived functors definable when the appropriate diagram categories admit compatible model structures or through particular formulae that give the right notion in certain examples. Riehl unifies these seemingly rival perspectives and demonstrates that model structures on diagram catego… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
121
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
121
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the reader's convenience, we review the basics of the theory of weighted limits in §5.1. A more thorough treatment can be found in [14] or [22]. In §5.3, we establish a correspondence between projective cofibrant simplicial functors and certain relative simplicial computads that will be exploited in section 6 to identify projective cofibrant weights.…”
Section: Weighted Limits In Qcat ∞mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the reader's convenience, we review the basics of the theory of weighted limits in §5.1. A more thorough treatment can be found in [14] or [22]. In §5.3, we establish a correspondence between projective cofibrant simplicial functors and certain relative simplicial computads that will be exploited in section 6 to identify projective cofibrant weights.…”
Section: Weighted Limits In Qcat ∞mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, we see that qCat ∞ is closed under the formation of homotopy limits. See [22] for more details. 5.2.9.…”
Section: 28mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To spell this out more explicitly, the hom‐objects are double-struckZ‐graded F2‐vector spaces, Morfalse(A,Bfalse)=iZprefixMorifalse(A,Bfalse)endowed with differentials i:prefixMorifalse(A,Bfalse)prefixMori1false(A,Bfalse),that is, vector space homomorphisms satisfying i1i=0 and m=m(id+id),where m:prefixMorjfalse(B,Cfalse)prefixMorifalse(A,Bfalse)prefixMori+jfalse(A,Cfalse)denotes composition in scriptC, which is associative and unital. For more details on enriched categories, see for example . Note that the identity morphisms have degree 0 and lie in the kernel of .…”
Section: Preliminaries: Algebraic Structures From Dg Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard reasoning by induction on context thus becomes simple algebraic calculation. A second, crucial notion is cofibrantly generated factorisation systems, a notion from homotopy theory [13,22] which, together with cellularity, allows for a conceptually simple, yet relevant characterisation of well-behaved transition contexts.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%