2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00012-017-0453-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Categorical equivalence and the Ramsey property for finite powers of a primal algebra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Actually, even more is true: if C and D are equivalent categories and one of them has the (dual) Ramsey property, then so does the other. We refrain from providing the definition of (the fairly standard notion of) categorical equivalence as we shall have no use for it in this paper, and for the proof we refer the reader to [9].…”
Section: Category Theory and The Ramsey Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Actually, even more is true: if C and D are equivalent categories and one of them has the (dual) Ramsey property, then so does the other. We refrain from providing the definition of (the fairly standard notion of) categorical equivalence as we shall have no use for it in this paper, and for the proof we refer the reader to [9].…”
Section: Category Theory and The Ramsey Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 3 we provide basics of category theory and give a categorical reinterpretation of the Ramsey property as proposed in [9]. We define the Ramsey property and the dual Ramsey property for a category and illustrate these notions using some well-known examples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense it can be considered as a dual of the Nešetřil-Rödl Theorem (without forbidden substructures): objects are combinatorial cubes with selected combinatorial subspaces and morphisms preserve the types of the selected subspaces. In this paper, however, we consider a dual of the Nešetřil-Rödl Theorem spelled out in the language of relational structures and base our approach on [9] which can be thought of as a simplified version of the approach taken in [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this paper is to show the following result which clearly generalizes each of the results listed in Theorem 1.1: It was Leeb who pointed out in 1970 [11] that the use of category theory can be quite helpful both in the formulation and in the proofs of results pertaining to structural Ramsey theory. We pursued this line of thought in several papers [12,13,14] and demonstrated that reinterpreting the Ramsey property in the context of category theory and using the machinery of category theory can lead to essentially new proving strategies. The proof of Theorem 1.2 will represent another demonstration of these new strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%