2006
DOI: 10.1142/s0219498806001909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Categorical Description of Some Differentiation Algorithms

Abstract: It is presented a complete categorical description of one of the main differentiation algorithms for representations of posets with involution — Differentiation II — constructed originally by the second author at the end of the 80's on the base of the matrix approach. A similar categorical description of some simpler additional differentiations is given as well.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present section we recall main results and notation regarding classification of ordinary posets and with involution [6,23,24,28,29,32].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the present section we recall main results and notation regarding classification of ordinary posets and with involution [6,23,24,28,29,32].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example in Fig. 2, we show a poset with involution (P, ) where a < b * , a * < b, a * < b * and = {(a, a * ), (b, b * )}) [6].…”
Section: Posets With Involutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Gabriel gave the categorical interpretation of the algorithm of differentiation with respect to a maximal point of Nazarova and Roiter in [16]. On the other hand, in [7,9,10,34] Cañadas and Zavadskij investigated some categorical properties of some algorithms of differentiation for posets with involution, equipped posets and Figure 11. A slide of the talk given by Zavadskij in Bielefeld-1998 (ICRA) where the original idea of equipped posets is explained and Zavadskij's finite growth representation type criterion.…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%