2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.09.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catchment controls on solute export

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

32
447
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(508 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
32
447
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In a large majority of situations (all three solutes in US-Agr, US-For, MEIS and HAUS, and NO − 3 in LS-Agr), CV C CV Q (Table 1), which reveals a biogeochemical stationarity termed "chemostasis" in previous catchments studies (Basu et al, 2010;Musolff et al, 2015;Godsey et al, 2009). Only SRP and DOC in the LS-Agr catchment exhibited a higher coefficient of variation than discharge (Table 1).…”
Section: Discharge and Concentration Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a large majority of situations (all three solutes in US-Agr, US-For, MEIS and HAUS, and NO − 3 in LS-Agr), CV C CV Q (Table 1), which reveals a biogeochemical stationarity termed "chemostasis" in previous catchments studies (Basu et al, 2010;Musolff et al, 2015;Godsey et al, 2009). Only SRP and DOC in the LS-Agr catchment exhibited a higher coefficient of variation than discharge (Table 1).…”
Section: Discharge and Concentration Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Second, to quantify the overall variability of discharge (daily) and concentration data (grab sampling), the coefficients of variation (CV) for both discharge and concentrations were calculated for each study catchment and for each year. The coefficient of variation, defined as the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean of a variable, has been used for the same purpose in previous water quantity (Botter et al, 2013) and water quality studies (Dupas et al, 2016b;Musolff et al, 2015;Thompson et al, 2011). Finally, correlation coefficients were calculated between solute concentrations and discharge and between pairs of solute concentrations.…”
Section: Discharge and Concentration Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that these authors have referred to b~0 as "chemostatic," but we prefer "constant" because we reserve the former term for export regimes, which we define below as differentiated from C-Q patterns. Chemostatic export regimes have been observed for geologic weathering products such as Ca +2 , Mg 2+ , and K + [Godsey et al, 2009;Herndon et al, 2015;Musolff et al, 2015], as well as anthropogenically mediated solutes, such as NO 3 À and PO 4 À [Basu et al, 2010;Jawitz and Mitchell, 2011], and animalborne hormones [Gall et al, 2016]. In chemostatic export regimes, the coefficient of variation (CV) is low for C relative to Q, with CV C /CV Q ≤ 0.5 independent of slope b. Consequently, exported solute load variance CV L is dominated by discharge variance which reflects in CV L /CV Q~1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemostatic export regimes have been observed for geologic weathering products such as Ca +2 , Mg 2+ , and K + [Godsey et al, 2009;Herndon et al, 2015;Musolff et al, 2015], as well as anthropogenically mediated solutes, such as NO 3 À and PO 4 À [Basu et al, 2010;Jawitz and Mitchell, 2011], and animalborne hormones [Gall et al, 2016]. Note that measures of C-Q patterns and export regimes are not independent; e.g., a strong enrichment pattern as shown for dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in the Lehstenbach catchment ( Figure 1b) cannot coincide with a chemostatic export regime [Jawitz and Mitchell, 2011;Musolff et al, 2015]. An example for chemodynamic export can be found in Figure 1 for NO 3 + in H.J.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minella et al (2008) point out that the transport capacity of the channel may increase, and that the stream bed sediment is easily mobilized during runoff events with no eroded sediment from the catchment. Zumr et al (2015) and also Musolff et al (2015) show that a quick runoff response with no soil erosion on the fields is very commonly observed on cultivated catchments where subsurface runoff or tile drains are the dominant controls. The resuspension regime of the stream bed sediment and the connected nutrient transport depend on the characteristics of the stream, the hydrograph of the flood wave and the actual conditions of the channel (Peterson and Benning, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%