Catching ghosts with a coarse net: use and abuse of spatial sampling data in detecting synchronization

Abstract

Synchronization of population dynamics in different habitats is a frequently observed phenomenon. A common mathematical tool to reveal synchronization is the (cross)correlation coefficient between time courses of values of the population size of a given species where the population size is evaluated from spatial sampling data. The corresponding sampling net or grid is often coarse, i.e. it does not resolve all details of the spatial configuration, and the evaluation error-i.e. the difference between the true value of the population size and its estimated value-can be considerable. We show that this estimation error can make the value of the correlation coefficient very inaccurate or even irrelevant. We consider several population models to show that the value of the correlation coefficient calculated on a coarse sampling grid rarely exceeds 0.5, even if the true value is close to 1, so that the synchronization is effectively lost. We also observe 'ghost synchronization' when the correlation coefficient calculated on a coarse sampling grid is close to 1 but in reality the dynamics are not correlated. Finally, we suggest a simple test to check the sampling grid coarseness and hence to distinguish between the true and artifactual values of the correlation coefficient.

Effect of density-dependent individual movement on emerging spatial population distribution: Brownian motion vs Levy flights

“…One way to analyse the sampling data, especially in the absence of knowledge of the spatial pattern, is to consider the frequency distribution of sample values. This approach was used in several empirical studies [7,13,15,28,74] and was shown to provide valuable insight into the properties of the corresponding population dynamics [62,80]; see also [9,94] for a more general framework. In order to demonstrate how to relate a given spatial pattern to the frequency distribution of sample values, let us consider the snapshot of the population distribution shown in Fig.…”

“…Distinctly heterogeneous or even 'patchy' distributions are ubiquitous in different ecosystems and are seen at different spatial and temporal scales [44,45]. This phenomenon-also referred to as aggregation or patchiness [18,44] or, more generally, ecological pattern formation [59]-is known to have important implications for population dynamics [55,66,87], nature conservation and renewable resource management [16,92,93], agriculture and forestry [1,39,75,81,90], monitoring and pest control [62,64,67], etc. Correspondingly, the factors and processes resulting in ecological pattern formation have been a focus of substantial empirical and theoretical research for a few decades.…”

Towards the Development of a More Accurate Monitoring Procedure for Invertebrate Populations, in the Presence of an Unknown Spatial Pattern of Population Distribution in the Field

“…Inaccurate evaluation of the total population size (or average density) may also result in a loss of important information about the properties of ecological dynamics. This can lead to incorrect conclusions, for instance, about the existence of a strong correlation (synchronisation) between population fluctuations in different habitats [ 3 ] or between different species, e.g., between pest and natural enemy populations [ 4 ].…”

Phase Multistability of Dynamics Modes of the Ricker Model with Periodic Malthusian Parameter

“…№ 1. doi: 10.17537/2018. 13.68 пространстве популяций [12,13]. При этом для локальных однородных популяций синхронность и асинхронность динамических режимов практически не рассматриваются, хотя известны случаи, когда в рамках двух идентичных популяций, обитающих в схожих условиях, наблюдаются противофазные колебания.…”