1996
DOI: 10.1086/285966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catastrophic Extinction of Population Sources in a Butterfly Metapopulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
144
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
144
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Not only could this have an effect on the butterfly fauna by reducing the positive aspect of snow depth, it also has the potential for shifting emergence phenologies. This could create phenological mismatch, or exacerbate mismatch, between butterfly species and resources (Thomas et al 1996, Singer and Parmesan 2010, Boggs and Inouye 2012, possibly leading to further declines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Not only could this have an effect on the butterfly fauna by reducing the positive aspect of snow depth, it also has the potential for shifting emergence phenologies. This could create phenological mismatch, or exacerbate mismatch, between butterfly species and resources (Thomas et al 1996, Singer and Parmesan 2010, Boggs and Inouye 2012, possibly leading to further declines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The persistence of snow in the spring months, and the short flight period at Donner Pass, might explain why we found a negative effect of warmer spring temperatures compared to other studies. Warmer temperatures might reduce snow by melting, and thus make overwintering larvae and pupae more susceptible to bacterial or fungal infection, or disrupt butterfly phenologies (Thomas et al 1996, Singer and Parmesan 2010, Boggs and Inouye 2012.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of the genetic and ecological factors that limit the niche breadth of a species in a heterogeneous habitat still remains largely an open question. In this paper, we suggest that host range evolution may be very sensitive to demographic disturbances affecting both population densities and migration patterns in a heterogeneous habitat.The present theoretical study is inspired by the dynamics and rapid evolution of a heterogeneous metapopulation of the checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas editha Thomas et al 1996;Boughton 1999). Before 1989, larvae of E. editha were found on two host plants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present theoretical study is inspired by the dynamics and rapid evolution of a heterogeneous metapopulation of the checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas editha Thomas et al 1996;Boughton 1999). Before 1989, larvae of E. editha were found on two host plants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The butterflies show regional adaptation to their respective patch network, and, hence, the performance of metapopulations in their "own" network should be relatively little affected. The situation would be different if a new area would be colonized by butterflies adapted to a landscape with a dissimilar plant-species composition or distribution of host plants among the habitat patches (Singer 1994;Singer and Thomas 1996;Thomas et al 1996). Therefore, a more fundamental and mechanistic understanding of the ecological dynamics is obtained, and potentially more powerful predictive models can be constructed, if the colonization effect and other such phenotype or genotype-dependent effects would be included in the ecological models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%