Catastrophic Economic Consequences of Healthcare Payments: Effects on Poverty Estimates in Egypt, Jordan, and Palestine

Abstract

Healthcare payments could drive households with no health insurance coverage into financial catastrophe, which might lead them to cut spending on necessities, sell assets, or use credit. In extreme cases, healthcare payments could have devastating consequences on the household economic status that would push them into extreme poverty. Using nationally representative surveys from three Arab countries, namely, Egypt, Jordan, and Palestine, this paper examines the incidence, intensity and distribution of catastrophic health payments, and assesses the poverty impact of out-of-pocket health payments (OOP). The OOP for healthcare were considered catastrophic if it exceeded 10% of a household's total expenditure or 40% of non-food expenditure. The poverty impact was evaluated using poverty head counts and poverty gaps before and after OOP. Results show that OOP exacerbate households' living severely in Egypt, pushing more than one-fifth of the population into a financial catastrophe and 3% into extreme poverty in 2011. However, in Jordan and Palestine, the disruptive impact of OOP remains modest over time. In the three countries, the catastrophic health payment is the problem of the better off households. Poverty alleviation policies should help reduce the reliance on OOP to finance healthcare. Moving toward universal health coverage could also be a promising option to protect households from the catastrophic economic consequences of health care payments.

Decomposing inequality in financial protection situation in Iran after implementing the health reform plan: What does the evidence show based on national survey of households' budget?

“…It can be argued that one explanation for this may be lack of utilization by those in low‐income levels, so actually, they are excluded from the cycle of receiving services, and higher income households can use healthcare services, and consequently, they are more likely to face catastrophic health expenditures. This issue was also mentioned in a study conducted by Rashad et al in Egypt, Jordan, and Palestine . Results of a study in Malaysia showed that although urban households in Kuala Lumpur are richer than those in rural areas, they are at a higher rate of exposure to catastrophic expenditures resulted from hospitalization because of rotavirus gastroenteritis; this is because of the development of the desirable primary healthcare network in rural areas and the possibility for the utilization of healthcare services with lower direct and indirect costs for rural households, compared to urban households.…”

Socioeconomic Inequalities in Maternity Care Utilization: Evidence From Egypt, Jordan and Yemen

“…The demand for maternity healthcare is mainly served by private health providers that require fees, as public health service is widely viewed as an inferior service. The reliance on private healthcare in Egypt was found to be pushing a substantial proportion of households into poverty and deprivation (Rashad & Sharaf, , ).…”

Does Public Health Insurance Increase Maternal Health Care Utilization in Egypt?

“…Achieving an equitable access to health care and protecting the poor from encountering catastrophic medical payments have been the key objectives of the Health Insurance Agency (HIA) that was developed in 1964. However, paying for medical care remains a major barrier for receiving health care, as HIA covers only 55 per cent of the Egyptians (Rashad & Sharaf, ).…”