1955
DOI: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1955.tb11096.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cataphyll Ontogeny in Pinus Lambertiana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1955
1955
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Foliar development in Dacrydium taxoides has been studied by Lee (1952), and Sacher (1955) de-scribed eataphyll ontogeny in Pinus lambertiana. Additional information on the ontogeny of leaves in this group of plants is necessary before broad comparisons within the group as well as with angiospermous plants can be made.…”
Section: Foliar Ontogeny In Podocarpus Macrophyllus With Special Refmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foliar development in Dacrydium taxoides has been studied by Lee (1952), and Sacher (1955) de-scribed eataphyll ontogeny in Pinus lambertiana. Additional information on the ontogeny of leaves in this group of plants is necessary before broad comparisons within the group as well as with angiospermous plants can be made.…”
Section: Foliar Ontogeny In Podocarpus Macrophyllus With Special Refmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al-Sherifi (1952) and Sacher (1955) found that leaves of several species of the Cupressaceae have the typical gymnosperm pattern of leaf development: an initial phase of apical growth, followed by a prolonged second phase in which the apical meristem is replaced with a nearly basal intercalary meristem. Al-Sherifi (1952) and Sacher (1955) found that leaves of several species of the Cupressaceae have the typical gymnosperm pattern of leaf development: an initial phase of apical growth, followed by a prolonged second phase in which the apical meristem is replaced with a nearly basal intercalary meristem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaf development in J. chinensis 'Torulosa variegata' appears to be typical of junipers in general. Al-Sherifi (1952) and Sacher (1955) found that leaves of several species of the Cupressaceae have the typical gymnosperm pattern of leaf development: an initial phase of apical growth, followed by a prolonged second phase in which the apical meristem is replaced with a nearly basal intercalary meristem. The juniper stem establishes files of cells below the apex that extend down the stem, resulting in subtending leaves coming from common cell files and sharing any sectors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In T. dolabrata, however, even the development of two buds side by side in one axil was observed occasionally. DISCUSSION -Whereas the histology of the shoot apex ofconifers always has received considerable attention, only a few investigations have been made on the ontogeny of axillary buds in conifers (Koch, 1891;Cross, 1939;Sterling, 1945;Sacher, 1955;Seeliger, 1955;Guttenberg, 1961). This may be partly due to the difficulty of encountering different developmental stages of axillary bud initiation at a shoot tip of most conifers since normal axillary buds are formed in the axils of only a few leaves.…”
Section: Sequoia Sempervirens-unlikementioning
confidence: 99%