2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalytic Turnover-Based Phage Selection for Engineering the Substrate Specificity of Sfp Phosphopantetheinyl Transferase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
85
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results highlight the attractive features of yeast display that offer significant advantages for enzyme evolution, including quality control mechanisms within the secretory pathway that ensure display of properly folded proteins and compatibility with FACS (18). For these reasons, we used yeast as the vehicle for display instead of an M13 phage simultaneously displaying an Sfp peptide substrate and an enzyme library (33). As the method developed here does not rely on any particular screenable or selectable property of the substrates or product, it is in principle compatible with any bond-forming enzyme that can be expressed in yeast, including glycosylated proteins that are likely incompatible with phage and mRNA display, provided that linkage of the substrates to CoA and to the affinity handle is possible and tolerated by the enzyme or its evolved variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results highlight the attractive features of yeast display that offer significant advantages for enzyme evolution, including quality control mechanisms within the secretory pathway that ensure display of properly folded proteins and compatibility with FACS (18). For these reasons, we used yeast as the vehicle for display instead of an M13 phage simultaneously displaying an Sfp peptide substrate and an enzyme library (33). As the method developed here does not rely on any particular screenable or selectable property of the substrates or product, it is in principle compatible with any bond-forming enzyme that can be expressed in yeast, including glycosylated proteins that are likely incompatible with phage and mRNA display, provided that linkage of the substrates to CoA and to the affinity handle is possible and tolerated by the enzyme or its evolved variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20] We recently developed a method for the codisplay of enzymes and peptide substrates on the phage surface and used this method to evolve the protein post-translational modification (PTM) enzyme Sfp. [21] Sfp is a phosphopantetheinyl transferase that can modify an 11-residue peptide, ybbR, with smallmolecule probes conjugated to coenzyme A (CoA). [22] To select for Sfp mutants that utilize 3'-dephospho CoA (dpCoA) in ybbR modification, we linked the coding sequence for the ybbR peptide to the pIII gene in the genome of M13KO7 helper phage to construct the helper phage "ybbR-M13".…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22] To select for Sfp mutants that utilize 3'-dephospho CoA (dpCoA) in ybbR modification, we linked the coding sequence for the ybbR peptide to the pIII gene in the genome of M13KO7 helper phage to construct the helper phage "ybbR-M13". [21] ybbR-M13 produces phage particles with the ybbR peptide fused to the N terminus of the pIII capsid protein that is exposed on the phage surface (Scheme 1 G). During phage proScheme 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations