2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.05.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalytic reforming of methane with CO2 over metal foam based monolithic catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that the process can be performed in the kinetic regime by applying very thin sorbent layers onto structured supports [44]. Recently, the application of metal wires, gauzes and foams as support for reforming catalysts and sorbents is also considered [45]. The maximum temperature during the desorption step cannot be increased above 1173 K as this would substantially reduce the lifetime of CaO sorbent.…”
Section: Effect Of Desorption Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the process can be performed in the kinetic regime by applying very thin sorbent layers onto structured supports [44]. Recently, the application of metal wires, gauzes and foams as support for reforming catalysts and sorbents is also considered [45]. The maximum temperature during the desorption step cannot be increased above 1173 K as this would substantially reduce the lifetime of CaO sorbent.…”
Section: Effect Of Desorption Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, this new structure is opening an opportunity on the development of novel monolithic catalyst with significantly enhanced heat transfer that is desired for suppressing the catalytic bed 'hot-or cold-spots' formation in the strongly exo-or endo-thermic reaction processes. So far, some foam-structured catalysts using SiC foam [13], compressed Ni-Al foam [14] and stainless steel metal foam [15], have been reported for the methane reforming processes. Such catalysts obtained via traditional wash-coating, dipcoating or extrusion methods [16,17], however, suffer from the random distribution of active components, detachment of coatings, binder harmful contamination, and the blockage of channels [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reactor was a double walled quartz reactor tube and the absorber/reformer was placed in the inner tube behind the quartz window ( Figure Figure 8 shows that the alumina supported catalyst is better in terms of sustaining activity throughout the entire test [49]. It also shows that Ru is best in terms of maintaining activity for extended periods of operation [49,51]. The alumina support was applied in two different ways and a comparison of the two methods is shown in Figure 9.…”
Section: ]mentioning
confidence: 99%